Not logged inRybka Chess Community Forum
Up Topic Rybka Support & Discussion / Rybka Discussion / New style evals by Rybka in Leiden
- - By Eelco de Groot (***) Date 2008-11-14 18:25 Edited 2008-11-14 18:42
The 28th Dutch Open has started today in Leiden. Maybe we later we'll hear more from Jeroen if he is present or from Cluster Master Lukas Cimiotti, Hans van der Zijden is in Leiden but I think he is not yet a forum member here?! There is a thread with some news from Harvey and Richard Pijl at the Hiarcs Forum. Harvey also broadcasts the games on Playchess, I'm not sure if all games can be transmitted, have not checked there yet.

See below for the results after the first two rounds today.

Rybka in the lead, the first game against the Baron was played after a delay because of problems with the trains, Fonzy could not make it in time to the first round. The game was played with reduced timecontrols after Fonzy finally arrived.

Quote from Jan Krabbenbos on the CSVN site

Geschreven door Jan Krabbenbos    
vrijdag, 14 november 2008 
The first round has started half an hour ago. We are missing The Baron at the moment. As Richard has asked someone else to attend today, we hope his replacement will come in time!

14:00 No sign of Fons and the Baron.

14:20 Due to delays and other train problems, Fons arrived just now. He is looking very sad. Also Walter Ravenek joins the public. He could not compete this year with his program, as he did not do anything on his program. Hans Secelle is telling everybody his ordeal of leaving his luggage at home.

14:30 The Baron and  Rybka do play with less time this round. The organisation decided this, as this is a better solution for the tournament than a reglementary result. 


Here the pgn of the round two game The King vs Rybka. Curious large evals, in centipawns it seems, if they are from Rybka apparently there is no more limit of evals to 5.2 or so anymore!

We already saw Rybka output larger evals at the ACCA tournament too in Prof. Hyatt's post. I think it is Rybka's output because the evals are for Rybka's side and in the game against the Baron there is the same output. Curious what is the 3i8 cluster? Will the output change for an update to Rybka? For a cluster there are of course different considerations because there is no shared hashtable.

[Event "28th Dutch CC"]
[Site "Leiden NED"]
[Date "2008.11.14"]
[Round "2"]
[White "The King"]
[Black "Rybka 3i8 cluster log"]
[Result "*"]
[ECO "D91"]
[PlyCount "104"]
[TimeControl "4800"]

{255MB, LeidenA.ctg} 1. d4 {[%emt 0:00:00]} Nf6 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 2.
c4 {[%emt 0:00:18]} g6 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 3. Nc3 {[%emt 0:00:12]} d5
{[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 4. Nf3 {[%emt 0:00:28]} Bg7 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:
00:00]} 5. Bg5 {[%emt 0:00:12]} Ne4 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 6. cxd5 {
[%emt 0:00:22]} Nxg5 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 7. Nxg5 {[%emt 0:00:21]} e6 {
[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 8. Nf3 {[%emt 0:00:22]} exd5 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:
00:00]} 9. e3 {[%emt 0:00:25]} a5 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 10. Bd3 {[%emt
0:03:33]} O-O {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 11. O-O {[%emt 0:03:05]} c6 {[%eval
0,22] [%emt 0:03:10]} 12. Rc1 {[%emt 0:00:15]} Bg4 {[%eval -9,22] [%emt 0:03:
17]} 13. h3 {[%emt 0:00:00]} Bxf3 {[%eval -8,21] [%emt 0:03:29]} 14. Qxf3 {
[%emt 0:00:11]} Nd7 {[%eval -9,21] [%emt 0:02:27]} 15. Rfd1 {[%emt 0:02:43]}
Re8 {[%eval -12,20] [%emt 0:02:27]} 16. Qg3 {[%emt 0:01:08]} Nf8 {[%eval -14,
22] [%emt 0:02:09]} 17. Na4 {[%emt 0:01:02]} Qe7 {[%eval -16,22] [%emt 0:02:06]
} 18. Nc5 {[%emt 0:02:23]} a4 {[%eval -15,22] [%emt 0:00:00]} 19. Rc2 {[%emt 0:
01:52]} Rec8 {[%eval -17,23] [%emt 0:02:58]} 20. Be2 {[%emt 0:02:36]} Ne6 {
[%eval -16,22] [%emt 0:02:29]} 21. Nxe6 {[%emt 0:00:24]} Qxe6 {[%eval -18,22]
[%emt 0:01:02]} 22. Rdc1 {[%emt 0:01:11]} Bf8 {[%eval -18,22] [%emt 0:02:01]}
23. Qf3 {[%emt 0:03:14]} a3 {[%eval -34,22] [%emt 0:02:00]} 24. Rb1 {[%emt 0:
02:07]} axb2 {[%eval -34,22] [%emt 0:01:19]} 25. Rcxb2 {[%emt 0:02:40]} b5 {
[%eval -35,22] [%emt 0:00:01]} 26. Rc2 {[%emt 0:00:46]} Ra6 {[%eval -35,22]
[%emt 0:01:19]} 27. Bf1 {[%emt 0:01:25]} Rca8 {[%eval -38,22] [%emt 0:01:27]}
28. Qe2 {[%emt 0:01:01]} Ra4 {[%eval -39,21] [%emt 0:01:39]} 29. Qd2 {[%emt 0:
00:46]} R8a6 {[%eval -39,21] [%emt 0:01:06]} 30. Rbb2 {[%emt 0:01:38]} Ba3 {
[%eval -39,22] [%emt 0:01:47]} 31. Rb3 {[%emt 0:01:04]} Bd6 {[%eval -39,22]
[%emt 0:01:46]} 32. Rbb2 {[%emt 0:00:23]} Qe7 {[%eval -39,22] [%emt 0:01:32]}
33. Rb3 {[%emt 0:00:56]} h5 {[%eval -41,21] [%emt 0:01:25]} 34. Qc1 {[%emt 0:
01:20]} Rxa2 {[%eval -106,18] [%emt 0:00:32]} 35. Rxc6 {[%emt 0:02:09]} Rxc6 {
[%eval -183,17] [%emt 0:00:13]} 36. Qxc6 {[%emt 0:00:17]} Qh4 {[%eval -234,18]
[%emt 0:00:00]} 37. Qxd6 {[%emt 0:00:50]} Qxf2+ {[%eval -259,21] [%emt 0:00:02]
} 38. Kh2 {[%emt 0:00:16]} Qxf1 {[%eval -259,21] [%emt 0:00:02]} 39. Qd8+ {
[%emt 0:00:43]} Kh7 {[%eval -286,21] [%emt 0:00:00]} 40. Qxd5 {[%emt 0:00:34]}
Ra1 {[%eval -402,15] [%emt 0:00:06]} 41. Kg3 {[%emt 0:00:49]} h4+ {[%eval -499,
17] [%emt 0:00:00]} 42. Kxh4 {[%emt 0:00:52]} Qf2+ {[%eval -509,19] [%emt 0:00:
00]} 43. g3 {[%emt 0:00:34]} Rf1 {[%eval -509,19] [%emt 0:00:00]} 44. Qe5 {
[%emt 0:03:37]} Qe2 {[%eval -824,21] [%emt 0:00:09]} 45. Qxb5 {[%emt 0:03:25]}
Qg2 {[%eval -816,19] [%emt 0:00:13]} 46. Qe5 {[%emt 0:00:32]} Rf5 {[%eval -798,
24] [%emt 0:00:00]} 47. Qxf5 {[%emt 0:00:30]} gxf5 {[%eval -853,16] [%emt 0:00:
00]} 48. Kg5 {[%emt 0:00:46]} Qxg3+ {[%eval -955,12] [%emt 0:00:12]} 49. Kxf5 {
[%emt 0:00:31]} Qg6+ {[%eval -1010,21] [%emt 0:00:00]} 50. Kf4 {[%emt 0:00:33]}
Qd6+ {[%eval -1016,22] [%emt 0:00:00]} 51. Ke4 {[%emt 0:00:18]} Qe6+ {[%eval
-1038,16] [%emt 0:00:05]} 52. Kf4 {[%emt 0:00:16]} Qxb3 {[%eval -1030,18]
[%emt 0:00:06]} *

Eelco
Parent - - By Lukas Cimiotti (Bronze) [de] Date 2008-11-14 19:45
Thanks for your informations :)

Evals are in centipawns - that's normal and has not been changed. The game you posted is pgn - if you open it  with your GUI, you'll get normal evals in pawns.
Something has changed, though - the cluster also displays evals of slaves, not only of the master.

Regards,
Lukas
Parent - - By Venator (Silver) [nl] Date 2008-11-14 20:22
Rybka is at 3/3 after the first day, beating The Baron, The King and Pandix. Fonzy, the operator of The Baron, was more than an hour late and hence the game Rybka-The Baron was first declared 1-0. I asked Hans to play the game anyway, as playing and winning is more fun than receiving a point by default.

The organisation accepted, but now Fonzy got problems with the internet connection. It took another 30 mins to get over them, after this the game finally could be played. Rybka won and so I was more happy with a win 'on the board' compared to the earlier 'win by default'.

Round 4 is tomorrow at 9:45 Dutch time and will feature the game Hiarcs-Rybka. Hans is broadcasting all Rybka games on Playchess. Rounds 4/5/6 will be on Saturday at 9:45, ~13:15 and ~16:45 local time.
Parent - - By Lukas Cimiotti (Bronze) [de] Date 2008-11-14 22:02
Thanks, Jeroen.
Could you please tell us the opponents of the other rounds?
Parent - By FWCC (***) [us] Date 2008-11-14 23:16
Rybka is still running on her 40 core monster cluster this tourney?
Parent - By Venator (Silver) [nl] Date 2008-11-15 08:01
Hi Lukas,

I have asked Hans to post the pairings of the remaining rounds. We have black against Hiarcs in round 4 and also black against Sjeng in another round. That´s what I know sofar :-)

Jeroen
Parent - - By Venator (Silver) [nl] Date 2008-11-15 08:37
Hans just sent me the Rybka pairings of round 5-9:

Round 4: Hiarcs - Rybka
Round 5: Rybka - Ktulu
Round 6: Rybka - Hermann
Round 7: Sjeng - Rybka
Round 8: Rybka - Tzunami
Round 9: Joker - Rybka
Parent - - By Venator (Silver) [nl] Date 2008-11-15 10:43
Round 4:  Hiarcs - Rybka 0-1

From Playchess (with Hiarcs evals):

[Event "Blitz:80'"]
[Site "28th ODCCC Leiden 2008"]
[Date "2008.11.15"]
[Round "4"]
[White "Hiarcs 12"]
[Black "Rybka 3"]
[Result "0-1"]
[PlyCount "98"]
[EventDate "2008.??.??"]
[TimeControl "4800"]

{2048MB, Hiarcs A.ctg, HARVEYWILLID19E} 1. d4 {B/0 0} Nf6 {7} 2. Nf3 {B/0 0} g6 {6} 3. c4 {B/0 0} Bg7 {6} 4. Nc3 {B/0 0} d5 {6} 5. cxd5 {B/0 0} Nxd5 {8} 6. e4 {B/0 0} Nxc3 {7} 7. bxc3 {B/0 0} c5 {6} 8. Bb5+ {B/0 0} Nc6 {8} 9. O-O {B/0 0} cxd4 {7} 10. cxd4 {B/0 1} O-O {8} 11. Be3 {B/0 0} Bg4 {10} 12. Bxc6 {B/0 0} bxc6 {10} 13. Rc1 {B/0 0} Qa5 {30} 14. Qe2 {B/0 0} Rfd8 {8} 15. Rc5 {0.38/17 114} Qa3 {11} 16. e5 {0.28/18 268} Be6 {192} 17. Rxc6 {0.03/17 1} Qxa2{211} 18. Rc2 {0.00/18 0} Qa4 {(Qa3) 208} 19. Bg5 {0.00/18 111} Bf8 {(Bd5) 133} 20. Re1 {-0.25/19 295} a5 {(Bd5) 192} 21. Be3 {-0.28/19 239} Bd5 {106} 22. Rec1 {-0.55/18 194} Qe8 {(Qd7) 9} 23. Nd2 {-0.46/18 190} a4 {98} 24. f3 {-0.74/18 134} a3 {12} 25. Ne4 {-0.92/19 160} Rdc8 {7} 26. Nc5 {-0.92/19 115} a2 {8} 27. Qe1 {-0.89/18 122} Rxc5 {(Rab8) 196} 28. Rxc5 {-1.39/19 83} e6 {25} 29.
Ra5 {-1.42/20 72} Ba3 {11} 30. Rxa3 {-1.51/20 107} Rxa3 {7} 31. Bd2 {
-1.78/20 171} Rb3 {30} 32. Bh6 {-1.96/19 83} Qa8 {30} 33. Kf2 {-2.00/19 52} Qb8 {6} 34. Qa5 {-2.83/19 212} Rb1 {22} 35. Qc7 {-3.19/20 101} Qxc7 {8} 36. Rxc7 {-3.35/20 10} Rb8 {9} 37. Rc1 {-3.50/21 40} g5 {10} 38. h3 {-3.55/21 79} Bc4 {(f5) 44} 39. Kg3 {-3.81/20 56} f6 {(f5) 47} 40. exf6 {-4.25/20 73} Kf7 {16} 41. Bxg5 {-4.33/20 44} Kg6 {7} 42. Bh4 {-4.34/20 60} Rb1 {8} 43. Rxc4 {-4.54/20 43} a1=Q {19} 44. Rc7 {-4.61/20 53} Qxd4 {26} 45. Rg7+ {-4.98/20 235} Kh6 {7} 46. f4 {-18.61/21 268} Qe4 {67} 47. Bg5+ {-21.25/19 29} Kh5 {10} 48. Kh2 {-#86/20 151} Rb2 {8} 49. Bh4 {-#21/16 0} Kxh4 {(Qxf4+) 11} 0-1
Parent - - By Carl Bicknell (*****) [gb] Date 2008-11-15 10:59
That was a fantastic game Jeroen. A real triumph of Rybka's superior understanding of strategy. I especially loved ...Qe8!
Parent - - By Venator (Silver) [nl] Date 2008-11-15 11:32
Yes, a very good game! White's opening choice 8.Bb5+ is rather drawish, but when Hiarcs missed 18.Qxa2 with an equal game, Rybka played the game in excellent fashion :-)
Parent - - By Ernst (***) [nl] Date 2008-11-15 11:47 Edited 2008-11-15 11:50
CSVN webside shows 1-0 :-D

http://www.csvn.nl/index.php?option=com_frontpage&Itemid=1

This morning round 4 takes place. With the clash between the titans: Hiarcs - Rybka.

white  black  result

Ktulu  Joker   1-0
The Baron  Tzunami  1-0
The King  Deep Sjeng  0-1
Pandix  Hermann  0-1
Hiarcs  Rybka  1-0
Parent - By Felix Kling (Gold) [de] Date 2008-11-15 11:52
also "Hiarcs is playing remote on a computer in the USA, Rybka plays remote with its 40 core machine probably in Budapest. And The Baron plays remote on a machine in Ruurlo, The Netherlands.

The programs Pandix and Tzunami play without opening book! Which is brave I think.

Hiarcs had some network trouble, but by moving the game to the bar, it was solved. No it was not the beer, since the last tournament we played here a wifi-forwarder has been installed. And Hiarcs was in the middle of both wifi-points and could not choose which to use. Next round we switch off the forwarder and the remote machines via wifi are relocated."

More probably Rybka's cluster is located in Minden/Westfalen :)
Parent - By Dragon Mist (****) [hr] Date 2008-11-15 11:19
Great stuff! Go Rybka team! :-)
Parent - - By Venator (Silver) [nl] Date 2008-11-15 14:26
Round 5: Rybka - Ktulu 1-0

<ironic mode switched on>
Not fixing the 'wrong coloured bishop' problem had its definite pros in this game :-)
<ironic mode switched off>

[Event "?"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "2008.11.15"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Rybka"]
[Black "Ktulu"]
[Result "1-0"]
[Annotator "Nightwish35"]
[PlyCount "107"]

1. e4 c5 2. Nc3 d6 3. Nge2 Nf6 4. d4 cxd4 5. Nxd4 a6 6. h3 e6 7. g4 b5 8. Bg2
Bb7 9. O-O b4 10. Nd5 exd5 11. exd5 Be7 12. g5 Nfd7 13. Nf5 O-O 14. Qd4 f6 15. Qxb4 Bc8 16. Re1 Ne5 17. Nxe7+ Qxe7 18. f4 Nbd7 19. fxe5 Nxe5 20. Bf4 Bf5 21. gxf6 Qxf6 22. Bxe5 dxe5 23. Rac1 Rab8 24. Qc3 Qg5 25. Qe3 Qg6 26. b3 Bxc2 27. Kh2 Rbe8 28. d6 Bf5 29. Rc6 e4 30. Rxa6 Ra8 31. Rxa8 Qxd6+ 32. Qg3 Qxg3+ 33. Kxg3 Rxa8 34. a4 Rb8 35. Rb1 e3 36. Re1 Be6 37. Rxe3 Bxb3 38. a5 Bc4 39. Rc3 Ba6 40. Rc6 Ra8 41. Rf6 gxf6 42. Bd5+ Kf8 43. Bxa8 Ke7 44. Be4 h6 45. Kg4 Kd6 46. Kh5 Ke5 47. Bc6 Kd6 48. Ba8 Kc5 49. Bf3 Kb4 50. Kxh6 Kxa5 51. Kg7 Bb5 52. Kf7 Bd3 53. Kxf6 Bb5 54. h4 1-0
Parent - - By Felix Kling (Gold) [de] Date 2008-11-15 14:38
10.Nd5 is nice
Parent - - By Venator (Silver) [nl] Date 2008-11-15 14:43
Rybka was in book until 15.Qxb4
Parent - By Felix Kling (Gold) [de] Date 2008-11-15 15:37
:)
Parent - - By Carl Bicknell (*****) [gb] Date 2008-11-15 15:41

> <ironic mode switched on>
> Not fixing the 'wrong coloured bishop' problem had its definite pros in this game :-)
> <ironic mode switched off>
>


haha that was good! Is there a crosstable to gawp at?
Parent - By Venator (Silver) [nl] Date 2008-11-15 17:38
Parent - - By Venator (Silver) [nl] Date 2008-11-15 17:11
Round 6: Rybka - Hermann 1-0

Rybka has 6/6 and is in the lead. Hiarcs-Sjeng is still running, when Sjeng wins it also has 6/6. Current position is unclear. Round 7 is Sjeng-Rybka.

[Event "?"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "2008.11.15"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Rybka 3"]
[Black "Hermann"]
[Result "1-0"]
[Annotator "Nightwish35"]
[PlyCount "117"]

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Be7 6. d3 d6 7. c3 Bg4 8. h3
Bd7 9. Be3 O-O 10. Re1 Na5 11. Bxd7 Qxd7 12. Nbd2 c5 13. d4 Qc7 14. Rc1 b5 15. b4 cxb4 16. cxb4 Nc4 17. Qe2 Rfc8 18. Bg5 h6 19. Bh4 exd4 20. Nxd4 Qa7 21. Nf5 Ne5 22. Nf1 Rxc1 23. Rxc1 g6 24. Nxe7+ Qxe7 25. Ne3 Qe6 26. Bxf6 Qxf6 27. Rc7 Qd8 28. Nd5 g5 29. Qd2 Kh8 30. Qc3 Kh7 31. Ne7 Qh8 32. Nf5 Rd8 33. Qd4 Rd7 34. Rxd7 Nxd7 35. Qxh8+ Kxh8 36. Nxh6 Ne5 37. Nf5 Nc4 38. Kh2 Kh7 39. Kg3 Kg6 40. f4 Na3 41. fxg5 Kxg5 42. Ne3 Nb1 43. h4+ Kg6 44. Kf4 Nc3 45. a3 Nb1 46. g4 Nxa3 47. h5+ Kh7 48. g5 Kg8 49. Nd5 Nc4 50. Kf5 Ne5 51. Ne7+ Kf8 52. Nc8 Nc4 53. Kf6 Ne5 54. Nxd6 Ng4+ 55. Kf5 Ne3+ 56. Ke5 Kg8 57. h6 Kf8 58. Nf5 Nc4+ 59. Kf6 1-0
Parent - By Venator (Silver) [nl] Date 2008-11-15 17:51
Hiarcs is doing Rybka a favour by beating Sjeng. That gives the following standings after round 6:

1. Rybka 6/6
2. Sjeng 5/6
3. Hiarcs 4.5/6

Tomorrow morning 9:45 local time round 7: Sjeng-Rybka.
Parent - - By Permanent Brain (*****) Date 2008-11-15 01:20
What does "Rybka 3i8 cluster log" mean? Are you playing on ridiculous hardware again? A title achieved by super hardware is meaningless! When is the Rybka team going to understand that? You have no sense for PR. If you want to impress anyone, use standard off-the-shelf hardware. How do I know that Zappa etc. on your hardware wouldn't do even better (or equally good if you score 100%)?
Parent - By turbojuice1122 (Gold) [us] Date 2008-11-15 01:53
That's not correct in practice.  When people buy software, they see the title "2008 World Computer Chess Champion" and know that it's the best.  If they need more reinforcement, they go to the ratings lists--but that statement goes a long way.  People don't bother to look to see on what hardware the program ran in that tournament--only some of the biggest hardware enthusiasts care about that.
Parent - - By Uri Blass (*****) [il] Date 2008-11-15 01:53
If you are interested in equal hardware you can look at the ssdf results ot at cegt results or ccrl results.
Tournaments are not to find which program is better and there are not enough rounds for that purpose.

The target is to win the tournament and not to impress you.
Increasing probability of 80% to win the tournament to probability of 95% is good.

Rybka is better based on every rating list with equal hardware so people do not use these tournament to get
an opinion about which program is better.

Uri
Parent - - By Roland Rösler (****) [de] Date 2008-11-15 03:38
The target is to win the tournament and not to impress you.

+1!
Parent - By Uly (Gold) [mx] Date 2008-11-15 03:41
The converse: The target is to impress you by playing the strongest SE possible chess and that's achieved with better hardware. :)
Parent - By Carl Bicknell (*****) [gb] Date 2008-11-15 11:25
I have to agree with Uri here. There is a place for equal hardware, of course, and its called the ratings lists. But tournaments are different. In tournaments we see special books, experimental software and super hardware - that's part of the fun.
Also any supercomputer like Hydra taking part would automatically be off the charts in this department
Parent - - By Dragon Mist (****) [hr] Date 2008-11-15 02:15

> What does "Rybka 3i8 cluster log" mean?


Could very well mean we're using that monster Lukas hardware again.
Parent - By Lukas Cimiotti (Bronze) [de] Date 2008-11-15 07:47
Rybka is running on my cluster, of course.
Since WCCC I made some improovements, built 2 new computers, replaced some CPUs and replaced one UPS.
But it's still 40 cores.

Regards,
Lukas
Parent - By ptobler (**) [au] Date 2008-11-15 02:50
It's not only the title I'm interested in - it's the best possible chess. So the better the hardware and the deeper the search, the better in my eyes! So that theory in chess advances.
Parent - By Razor (****) [gb] Date 2008-11-15 11:10
I'm with you on this one - meaningless.
Parent - - By Felix Kling (Gold) [de] Date 2008-11-15 00:17
Hans is a forum member :)
Parent - - By M ANSARI (*****) [kw] Date 2008-11-15 06:18
Well in this game I think the Cluster was totally passive.  Every move can be duplicated in the time allocation and depth with an 8 core Skulltrail.  There does seem to be about a .06 centipawn difference in evaluation on some positions so most likely the Rybka playing on the Master has a slightly more tuned evaluation than vanilla Rybka 3.  I would think that the evaluation would be somewhere between the evaluation of Rybka 3 default and Rybka 3 human.  Actually this is a pretty spectacular game because in this position where white played Rxp ... it only takes Rybka about a minute to see that this loses by force in a very deep variation

6k1/4qp2/r1Rb2p1/1p1p3p/3P4/1R2P2P/r4PP1/2Q2BK1 b - - 0 35
Parent - - By Laszlo (***) [fr] Date 2008-11-16 11:22
1r2k3/5pp1/3Pp2p/4P3/p1NN3P/B2K4/5PP1/1r6 b - - 0 47


Deep Sjeng-Rybka. 7/7 ??
Parent - - By Laszlo (***) [fr] Date 2008-11-16 11:25 Edited 2008-11-16 11:28
4k3/6p1/3Pp3/4Pp1p/3BKP1P/8/8/3r4 w - f6 0 61


[Event "?"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "????.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Analysis"]
[Black "?"]
[Result "*"]
[PlyCount "124"]

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 a6 3. c3 e6 4. d4 d5 5. e5 Bd7 6. Bd3 cxd4 7. cxd4 Bb5 8. O-O
Bxd3 9. Qxd3 Ne7 10. Bg5 h6 11. Bd2 Nec6 12. a3 Be7 13. Nc3 Nd7 14. Rfc1 O-O
15. Ne2 Qb6 16. Rc2 Qb5 17. Qe3 Rfc8 18. Rac1 Nb6 19. b3 Bxa3 20. Rc5 Bxc5 21.
Rxc5 Nc4 22. bxc4 Qb1+ 23. Ne1 b6 24. Nc3 Qb3 25. Rxc6 Rxc6 26. Nxd5 Qxe3 27.
Nxe3 b5 28. d5 Rcc8 29. d6 a5 30. cxb5 Rcb8 31. Nc4 Rxb5 32. Kf1 a4 33. Nc2 Kf8
34. N2a3 Rb3 35. Ke2 Ke8 36. Be3 Rab8 37. Bd4 R8b4 38. Ba1 Rb7 39. Nc2 Rb1 40.
Bd4 Rb8 41. h3 Rc8 42. Kd3 Ra8 43. Bc3 Rbb8 44. Bb4 Rb5 45. Ba3 Rab8 46. Nd4
Rb1 47. h4 Rf1 48. f3 h5 49. Bc5 Rd1+ 50. Kc2 Rg1 51. Kd3 Rxg2 52. Nb6 Rxb6 53.
Bxb6 a3 54. Nb3 Rb2 55. Kc3 Rb1 56. f4 a2 57. Bd4 a1=Q+ 58. Nxa1 Rxa1 59. Kd3
Rd1+ 60. Ke4 f5+!! 61. exf6 Rxd4+ 62. Kxd4 gxf6 *

4k3/8/3Ppp2/7p/3K1P1P/8/8/8 w - - 0 63
Parent - - By Venator (Silver) [nl] Date 2008-11-16 11:29
Round 7: Sjeng - Rybka 0-1

Standings:

1. Rybka 7/7
2. Hiarcs 5.5/7
3. Sjeng 5/7

[Event "Dutch Open"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "2008.11.16"]
[Round "7"]
[White "Deep Sjeng"]
[Black "Rybka 3"]
[Result "0-1"]
[Annotator "Nightwish35"]
[PlyCount "124"]

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 a6 3. c3 e6 4. d4 d5 5. e5 Bd7 6. Bd3 cxd4 7. cxd4 Bb5 8. O-O
Bxd3 9. Qxd3 Ne7 10. Bg5 h6 11. Bd2 Nec6 12. a3 Be7 13. Nc3 Nd7 14. Rfc1 O-O 15. Ne2 Qb6 16. Rc2 Qb5 17. Qe3 Rfc8 18. Rac1 Nb6 19. b3 Bxa3 20. Rc5 Bxc5 21. Rxc5 Nc4 22. bxc4 Qb1+ 23. Ne1 b6 24. Nc3 Qb3 25. Rxc6 Rxc6 26. Nxd5 Qxe3 27. Nxe3 b5 28. d5 Rcc8 29. d6 a5 30. cxb5 Rcb8 31. Nc4 Rxb5 32. Kf1 a4 33. Nc2 Kf8 34. N2a3 Rb3 35. Ke2 Ke8 36. Be3 Rab8 37. Bd4 R8b4 38. Ba1 Rb7 39. Nc2 Rb1 40. Bd4 Rb8 41. h3 Rc8 42. Kd3 Ra8 43. Bc3 Rbb8 44. Bb4 Rb5 45. Ba3 Rab8 46. Nd4 Rb1 47. h4 Rf1 48. f3 h5 49. Bc5 Rd1+ 50. Kc2 Rg1 51. Kd3 Rxg2 52. Nb6 Rxb6 53. Bxb6 a3 54. Nb3 Rb2 55. Kc3 Rb1 56. f4 a2 57. Bd4 a1=Q+ 58. Nxa1 Rxa1 59. Kd3 Rd1+ 60. Ke4 f5+ 61. exf6 Rxd4+ 62. Kxd4 gxf6 0-1
Parent - - By Felix Kling (Gold) [de] Date 2008-11-16 11:44
very, very nice :)
Parent - - By Venator (Silver) [nl] Date 2008-11-16 13:22
Round 8: Rybka - Tzunami 1-0

Rybka now has 8/8 and is the Dutch champion. With 1 round to spare she leads by 1.5 points.

[Event "Dutch Open"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "????.??.??"]
[Round "8"]
[White "Rybka 3"]
[Black "Tzunami"]
[Result "1-0"]
[Annotator "Nightwish35"]
[PlyCount "63"]

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 Nf6 4. O-O Nd4 5. Nxd4 exd4 6. e5 Nd5 7. Qg4 b4 8. a3 Nxc2 9. Ra2 Qe7 10. Qe4 c6 11. Ba4 Qe6 12. Qxc2 Qxa2 13. Bb3 Qa1 14. d3 a5 15. Qc4 d5 16. exd6 Be6 17. d7+ Kxd7 18. Qxd4+ Ke8 19. Bxe6 fxe6 20. Nc3 b5 21. Qg4 Kd7 22. Re1 Re8 23. Qd4+ Kc8 24. Qb6 Bd6 25. Qxc6+ Bc7 26. Nxb5 Re7 27. Nd6+ Kd8 28. Nb7+ Kc8 29. Nc5 a4 30. Qa6+ Kd8 31. Qa8+ Bb8 32. Qxb8# 1-0
Parent - - By Felix Kling (Gold) [de] Date 2008-11-16 13:46
yes, after the win against sjeng it was clear that Rybka wins the tournament. The chances for a perfect score qre quite good now :)
Parent - - By FWCC (***) [us] Date 2008-11-16 13:48
This run is quite impressive.She even beat Dsjeng,the game I was worried about.After it's all done where can we download all games from the site?
Parent - By Venator (Silver) [nl] Date 2008-11-16 17:15
Round 9: Joker - Rybka 0-1

Rybka wins Dutch Open with the perfect score 9/9.

[Event "Dutch Open"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "????.??.??"]
[Round "9"]
[White "Joker"]
[Black "Rybka 3"]
[Result "0-1"]
[Annotator "Nightwish35"]
[PlyCount "158"]

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 e6 3. Nc3 a6 4. Be2 Qc7 5. O-O b5 6. d4 cxd4 7. Nxd4 Bb7 8. Bf3 Nc6 9. Nxc6 dxc6 10. e5 Qxe5 11. Re1 Qc7 12. Ne4 Rd8 13. Qe2 Be7 14. Bh5 Bc8 15. Qf3 Nf6 16. Nxf6+ Bxf6 17. Bf4 Qb7 18. Qa3 b4 19. Qb3 O-O 20. Bf3 Qb5 21. Be2 Qc5 22. Be3 Bd4 23. Bd3 a5 24. a3 Bxe3 25. Rxe3 Rd4 26. axb4 axb4 27. Rh3 g6 28. Re3 Qd6 29. Re4 Bb7 30. Rxd4 Qxd4 31. Bf1 c5 32. c3 Qf4 33. Ra7 Bd5 34. Qa4 Qd2 35. c4 Be4 36. Qa1 b3 37. Qa3 Qc2 38. Rd7 Ra8 39. Qxc5 Qxb2 40. Qe7 Rf8 41. Qb4 Qa2 42. Rd2 Ra8 43. Qc3 Qa5 44. Qb2 Bc2 45. Rxc2 bxc2 46. Qxc2 Qe1 47. Qe2 Qxe2 48. Bxe2 Ra1+ 49. Bf1 Kf8 50. h4 e5 51. f3 f5 52. Kf2 Ke7 53. Bd3 Kd6 54. h5 Ra2+ 55. Kf1 Rd2 56. Be2 gxh5 57. f4 e4 58. Bxh5 Kc5 59. g3 e3 60. Be2 Kd4 61. g4 Rxe2 62. Kxe2 fxg4 63. c5 Kxc5 64. Kxe3 Kd5 65. Kd3 h5 66. Ke3 h4 67. f5 Ke5 68. f6 Kxf6 69. Kf2 Kg5 70. Ke2 h3 71. Kf1 g3 72. Kg1 Kf4 73. Kf1 Ke3 74. Ke1 h2 75. Kd1 Kd3 76. Kc1 h1=Q+ 77. Kb2 Qb7+ 78. Kc1 Qb6 79. Kd1 Qg1# 0-1
Parent - By turbojuice1122 (Gold) [us] Date 2008-11-16 18:03
Another nice endgame show by the Rybka cluster. :-)
Up Topic Rybka Support & Discussion / Rybka Discussion / New style evals by Rybka in Leiden

Powered by mwForum 2.27.4 © 1999-2012 Markus Wichitill