Not logged inRybka Chess Community Forum
Forum RybkaChess Help Search Register Login
Up Topic Rybka Support & Discussion / Rybka Discussion / 2008 Second Annual World Computer Rapid Chess Championships
1 2 3 4 5 Previous Next  
- - By Nick (****) [gb] Date 2008-06-21 13:51
There is an ACCA event being run on the ICC this weekend:

http://www.taccl.org/ACCAWCRCC/2008ACCAWCRCC/2008WCRCC.html

Rybka, HIARCS, Thinker, Sjeng and DIEP are participating along with 30+ participants.

Round 1 just finished, Rybka had a comfortable win:

[Event "ICC tourney 864 (25 4 u)"]
[Site "Internet Chess Club"]
[Date "2008.06.21"]
[Round "1"]
[White "Rybka"]
[Black "Tornado-C"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ICCResult "Black checkmated"]
[WhiteElo "2821"]
[BlackElo "2362"]
[Opening "Scotch: Potter variation"]
[ECO "C45"]
[NIC "SO.05"]
[Time "09:13:02"]
[TimeControl "1500+4"]

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 exd4 4. Nxd4 Bc5 5. Nb3 Bb6 6. a4 a6 7. Nc3 d6 8.
Nd5 Ba7 9. Be3 Bxe3 10. Nxe3 Nf6 11. Bd3 O-O 12. O-O Re8 13. f3 Be6 14. c4
a5 15. Rf2 b6 16. Bc2 Nb4 17. Nd4 Bd7 18. Qd2 Re5 19. b3 Qe7 20. Nd5 Nfxd5
21. cxd5 c5 22. dxc6 Bxc6 23. Nf5 Qf6 24. Rd1 d5 25. f4 Ree8 26. e5 Qd8 27.
Qe3 g6 28. Nh6+ Kg7 29. f5 f6 30. Ng4 g5 31. Nxf6 Rf8 32. Nh5+ Kh6 33. g4
Rf7 34. Qh3 Bd7 35. Rxd5 Na6 36. Rd6+ Be6 37. Rxe6+ Rf6 38. Nxf6+ Kg7 39.
Qxh7+ Kf8 40. Qg8# {Black checkmated} 1-0

HIARCS is having a pretty straightforwards win over messchess with the black pieces also.
Parent - - By Nick (****) [gb] Date 2008-06-21 15:11 Edited 2008-06-21 15:23
Second round, a nice Sicilian, Rybka's first move out of book with a +0.52 eval


Rybka(C) kibitzes: depth=14 time=5.94 node=3073750 speed=529974 score=+0.52 pv="Nxd5 Bf2 Bb7 O-O-O Bd6 Kb1 O-O Bc4 Ne5 Bg3 Qc7 Bxd5 Bxd5 Bxe5"


so possibly the opponent was underbooked

[Event "ICC tourney 864 (25 4 u)"]
[Site "Internet Chess Club"]
[Date "2008.06.21"]
[Round "2"]
[White "PetirX"]
[Black "Rybka"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ICCResult "White resigns"]
[WhiteElo "2540"]
[BlackElo "2821"]
[Opening "Sicilian: Najdorf, Byrne (English) attack"]
[ECO "B90"]
[NIC "SI.14"]
[Time "10:19:37"]
[TimeControl "1500+4"]

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 a6 6. Be3 e6 7. f3 b5 8. g4
h6 9. Qd2 b4 10. Na4 Nbd7 11. b3 d5 12. exd5 Nxd5 13. O-O-O N7f6 14. Bc4 Bd7
15. Ne2 Bxa4 16. bxa4 Qc7 17. Bxd5 Nxd5 18. Bd4 Rd8 19. Qd3 Be7 20. Qe4 O-O
21. Qe5 Qxe5 22. Bxe5 Rc8 23. Kb1 Nb6 24. Bd6 Bxd6 25. Rxd6 Nc4 26. Rxa6
Na3+ 27. Ka1 Rfd8 28. Nc1 Rxc2 29. Rb6 Rg2 30. Nb3 Rd3 31. f4 Nc2+ 32. Kb1
Rf3 33. Rb8+ Kh7 34. Rd8 Na3+ 35. Ka1 Rff2 36. Rd2 Rxd2 37. Nxd2 Rxd2 38. h3
Nc2+ 39. Kb1 Ne3 40. Rc1 Nd5 41. Rc4 Kg6 42. a5 Nc3+ 43. Kc1 Rxa2 44. Rxb4
Rxa5 45. Kb2 Nd1+ {White resigns} 0-1

Also (surprisingly) it looks like HIARCS (with the white pieces) will lose against DIEP.

EDIT: Yep.

[Event "ICC tourney 864 (25 4 u)"]
[Site "Internet Chess Club"]
[Date "2008.06.21"]
[Round "2"]
[White "Hiarcs8x"]
[Black "DIEP"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ICCResult "White checkmated"]
[WhiteElo "2817"]
[BlackElo "2572"]
[Opening "Petrov: classical attack, Jaenisch variation"]
[ECO "C42"]
[NIC "RG.06"]
[Time "10:19:41"]
[TimeControl "1500+4"]

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. Nxe5 d6 4. Nf3 Nxe4 5. d4 d5 6. Bd3 Nc6 7. O-O Be7 8.
c4 Nb4 9. Be2 O-O 10. Nc3 Be6 11. Ne5 f6 12. Nf3 Re8 13. a3 Nxc3 14. bxc3
Nc6 15. cxd5 Bxd5 16. Bd3 Qd7 17. Be3 Rad8 18. Rb1 Bf8 19. Nd2 b6 20. Bb5
Qd6 21. c4 Bf7 22. d5 Rxe3 23. fxe3 Ne5 24. Nf3 Qxa3 25. Rb3 Nxf3+ 26. Rxf3
Qa5 27. Rf1 Bd6 28. Qa1 Qxa1 29. Rxa1 a5 30. Ra2 Bg6 31. Bc6 Be4 32. Ba4 f5
33. g3 g5 34. Kf2 Rf8 35. Ke1 Kg7 36. Rf2 h5 37. Ke2 h4 38. gxh4 g4 39. Rc3
Kf6 40. Bc2 Bf3+ 41. Rxf3 gxf3+ 42. Kxf3 Rh8 43. c5 Bxc5 44. Rc4 Ke5 45. Rf4
Kxd5 46. Rxf5+ Kc4 47. h5 b5 48. Ke2 a4 49. Bd3+ Kb4 50. Rf4+ Kc3 51. Rf1 c6
52. Rc1+ Kb4 53. Bg6 a3 54. Rb1+ Ka4 55. Rc1 Bb6 56. Bc2+ Kb4 57. Bg6 c5 58.
Rb1+ Ka4 59. Bc2+ Ka5 60. Ra1 Kb4 61. Bg6 c4 62. Rb1+ Ka4 63. Bc2+ Ka5 64.
Bg6 b4 65. Ra1 Ka4 66. Bf7 b3 67. Bxc4 b2 68. Rf1 Rxh5 69. Ba2 Rc5 70. Rf6
Ba5 71. Rf8 Rc1 72. Rb8 Bc7 73. Rb7 Ra1 74. Bb3+ Ka5 75. Bc2 Bb6 76. Rb8 Ka6
77. Bd3+ Ka7 78. Rh8 a2 79. Rh7+ Kb8 80. Rh8+ Kc7 81. Rh7+ Kc8 82. Bf5+ Kd8
83. Rd7+ Ke8 84. Rg7 b1=Q 85. Bg6+ Kd8 86. Rg8+ Ke7 87. Re8+ Kd6 88. Kf3
Qf1+ 89. Kg3 Qe2 90. Kf4 Rg1 91. Bh5 Qxh5 92. Rd8+ Bxd8 93. h3 a1=Q 94. Ke4
Qd5+ 95. Kf4 Bg5# {White checkmated} 0-1
Parent - - By Nick (****) [gb] Date 2008-06-21 15:41 Edited 2008-06-21 16:17
Looks like another book win against Alaric (=TerraPi) in round 3.  Rybka came out of book but then went back in, this has led to a considerable advantage on the clock also as can be seen in the attached image.

EDIT. Alaric resigned

[Event "ICC tourney 864 (25 4 u)"]
[Site "Internet Chess Club"]
[Date "2008.06.21"]
[Round "3"]
[White "Rybka"]
[Black "TerraPi"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ICCResult "Black resigns"]
[WhiteElo "2821"]
[BlackElo "2646"]
[Opening "Scotch: Mieses variation"]
[ECO "C45"]
[NIC "SO.04"]
[Time "11:26:56"]
[TimeControl "1500+4"]

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 exd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nxc6 bxc6 6. e5 Qe7 7. Qe2 Nd5
8. c4 Nb6 9. Nc3 Qe6 10. Qe4 g6 11. Bd3 Ba6 12. b3 Bg7 13. f4 O-O 14. Ba3
Rfd8 15. Qf3 d6 16. O-O dxe5 17. f5 Qe8 18. Rad1 Bc8 19. f6 Bf8 20. Bxf8
Qxf8 21. Qg3 Re8 22. Ne4 Qh6 23. Ng5 Qh5 24. h3 h6 25. Ne4 Rb8 26. Rd2 g5
27. Nc5 Qh4 28. Qe3 Nd5 29. cxd5 cxd5 30. Bf5 c6 31. Nd7 d4 32. Qd3 Bxd7 33.
Bxd7 Red8 34. Qf5 g4 35. Qxe5 Qg5 36. Qxg5+ hxg5 37. Rxd4 gxh3 38. gxh3 Kh7
39. Rc1 Kh6 40. Rxc6 a5 41. Rcd6 Rb4 42. R4d5 Rb7 43. Kg2 a4 44. Bf5 Rxd6
45. Rxd6 Kh5 46. Kg3 Rb8 47. Rd7 g4 48. h4 Rf8 {Black resigns} 1-0
Parent - - By Nick (****) [gb] Date 2008-06-21 16:25 Edited 2008-06-21 16:51
Round 4, Rybka and Yace both lead with 3/3 and meet eachother.  Without wishing to denigrate the engine, I think that Yace has done this well so far largely due to Armando's book, but now he has to play us who hopefully should be wise to his Playchess Hernandez-inspired h3 tricks :)  Note the comment from Luminarydebris (Zacks) :)

EDIT: Move 27 we are +7 score, USCF commentator John Timmel says:

TimmelJ(64): Rybka really knows how to advance pawns for an attack

EDIT 2. Again we came out and went back into book, fortunately outbooking Armando ... Yace resigned on move 31

[Event "ICC tourney 864 (25 4 u)"]
[Site "Internet Chess Club"]
[Date "2008.06.21"]
[Round "4"]
[White "Yace"]
[Black "Rybka"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ICCResult "White resigns"]
[WhiteElo "2601"]
[BlackElo "2821"]
[Opening "Clemenz (Mead's, Basman's or de Klerk's) opening"]
[ECO "A00"]
[Time "12:20:35"]
[TimeControl "1500+4"]

1. h3 d5 2. c3 e5 3. d4 Nc6 4. Be3 e4 5. Bf4 Bd6 6. Bxd6 Qxd6 7. e3 Nge7 8.
Ne2 Bd7 9. c4 O-O-O 10. Nbc3 dxc4 11. Ng3 f5 12. Bxc4 Kb8 13. O-O g5 14. Rc1
h5 15. Nxh5 Qh6 16. g4 Be8 17. Be2 Nb4 18. Qb3 Nd3 19. Rc2 Bxh5 20. gxh5 g4
21. Qf7 Rh7 22. Qxh7 Qxh7 23. hxg4 fxg4 24. Kg2 Qxh5 25. Rh1 Qf5 26. Nd1 Rf8
27. a3 Nd5 28. Rc5 c6 29. Rh2 Nxf2 30. Rxd5 cxd5 31. Nc3 {White resigns} 0-1

Rybka will now take sole lead on 4/4, but a long way to go (14 rounds in total).
Parent - - By Sesse (****) [us] Date 2008-06-21 17:49
Great performance so far. When's the next games starting?

/* Steinar  */
Parent - By Sesse (****) [us] Date 2008-06-21 18:04 Edited 2008-06-21 18:19
Actually, HIARCS is now playing a game against Telepath, and Rybka just disconnected and came back in... What's happening?

Edit: Rybka vs. TheGiver seems to have started.

Edit 2: And Rybka seems to be heading for a win on knockout, after both players exiting their books very early.

/* Steinar */
Parent - - By Nick (****) [gb] Date 2008-06-21 18:31 Edited 2008-06-21 18:55
Thanks Steinar, this next game started three minutes late (Rybka autologged out due to inactivity, something which isn't supposed to happen with the "keepAlive" winboard option as it should enter the "date" command every 30 minutes) but we're off to a win I think, I started followed the game late, but possibly our first move out of book had an eval > +0.5 for white.

Our current opponent is TheGiver = Crash Test Dummy/The Baron from Richard Pijl - operated by his 13 year old daughter I believe.  Here is the latest grid:



>Automato
> icctd version: 8.653 (Compiled Jun 17 2008 19:24:50)
> #  864   2008 Second Annual World Computer Rapid Chess Championships Swiss Standard 25 4 unrated manager Ozgur-BJK
> ******   36 players/5 round (of 14)
>          Managed by Ozgur-BJK.   (Sat Jun 21 08  8:49 - ongoing)
>          System: main TD: Automato
>          max_bye_points:0
>          max_best:3000 last_sort:score scheduled: no
>     Name                  R1    R2    R3    R4    R5    Score  #g
>   1 Rybka          (2821) +w31  +b23  +w4   +b7    w2     4.0   4
>   2 TheGiver       (2735) +w17  +b18  =w3   +b9    b1     3.5   4
>   3 crafty         (2591) +b29  +w8   =b2   =w10   w4     3.0   4
>   4 TerraPi        (2646) +b12  +w15  -b1   +w20   b3     3.0   4
>   5 Hiarcs8x       (2817) +b26  -w9   +b12  +w15   b8     3.0   4
>   6 Sjeng          (2720) =b16  +w24  =b9   +w11   b7     3.0   4
>   7 Yace           (2601) +w35  +b27  +b20  -w1    w6     3.0   4
>   8 Telepath       (2416) +w34  -b3   +w28  +b21   w5     3.0   4
>   9 DIEP           (2572) +w22  +b5   =w6   -w2    b14    2.5   4
>  10 ChessThinkerX  (2946) =w19  =b16  +w30  =b3    w13    2.5   4
>  11 Amateur        (2492) -w28  +b19  +w27  -b6   =w12    2.5   5
>  12 Symbolic       (2313) -w4   +b34  -w5   +b28  =b11    2.5   5
>  13 DeltomateX     (2458) -b24  +w29  =b25  +w26   b10    2.5   4
>  14 Bugchess2      (2000) -w18  =b17  +w34  +b23   w9     2.5   4
>  15 ArasanX        (2526) +w25  -b4   +w16  -b5    b17    2.0   4
>  16 Deuterium2003  (2359) =w6   =w10  -b15  +b25   w18    2.0   4
>  17 Tinker         (2381) -b2   =w14  +b32  =b19   w15    2.0   4
>  18 BertaX         (2511) +b14  -w2   -b21  +w29   b16    2.0   4
>  19 TwistedLogic   (2426) =b10  -w11  +b24  =w17   b22    2.0   4
>  20 Frenzee        (2662) +w30  +b28  -w7   -b4    w21    2.0   4
>  21 zct            (2270) -w23  +b31  +w18  -w8    b20    2.0   4
>  22 Matilde        (2278) -b9   -w25  +w35  +b30   w19    2.0   4
>  23 PetirX         (2540) +b21  -w1   =b26  -w14   b24    1.5   4
>  24 Horizon-x      (2000) +w13  -b6   -w19  =b27   w23    1.5   4
>  25 Timea          (2157) -b15  +b22  =w13  -w16   b26    1.5   4
>  26 messchess      (2399) -w5   +b35  =w23  -b13   w25    1.5   4
>  27 NeurosisX      (2000) +b32  -w7   -b11  =w24   b31    1.5   4
>  28 HfC            (2000) +b11  -w20  -b8   -w12   b32    1.0   4
>  29 NoonianChess   (2281) -w3   -b13  +w31  -b18   w30    1.0   4
>  30 apocalypse1112 (2327) -b20  +w32  -b10  -w22   b29    1.0   4
>  31 Tornado-C      (2413) -b1   -w21  -b29  +b34   w27    1.0   4
>  32 ProphetX       (2441) -w27  -b30  -w17  +b35   w28    1.0   4
>  33 JokerX         (2345)                         +w34    1.0   1
>  34 Buzz           (2829) -b8   -w12  -b14  -w31  -b33    0.0   5
>  35 roce           (2283) -b7   -w26  -b22  -w32   b36    0.0   4
>  36 OxygenX        (2454)                          w35    0.0   0




EDIT: Comment from USCF commentator:


TimmelJ(64): Rybka's pieces too active

Round 5 victory over Crash Test Dummy (TheGiver):

[Event "ICC tourney 864 (25 4 u)"]
[Site "Internet Chess Club"]
[Date "2008.06.21"]
[Round "5"]
[White "Rybka"]
[Black "TheGiver"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ICCResult "Black checkmated"]
[WhiteElo "2821"]
[BlackElo "2762"]
[Opening "Old Benoni defense"]
[ECO "A46"]
[NIC "QP.06"]
[Time "14:05:18"]
[TimeControl "1500+4"]

1. d4 Nf6 2. Nf3 c5 3. d5 b5 4. c4 Bb7 5. a4 bxc4 6. Nc3 e6 7. e4 Qa5 8. Bd2
Qb6 9. a5 Qb3 10. Qxb3 cxb3 11. a6 Bc8 12. Bc4 d6 13. O-O Be7 14. Nb5 Nxa6
15. Rxa6 Bxa6 16. Nc7+ Kf8 17. Bxa6 Rb8 18. dxe6 Nxe4 19. Ba5 f5 20. Nd5 h5
21. Bc4 g5 22. Nd2 Nxd2 23. Bxd2 Rg8 24. Ra1 Rb7 25. Ba6 Rb8 26. Bd3 Rb7 27.
Bxf5 Kg7 28. Bc3+ Kh6 29. Be4 Rgb8 30. Ne3 h4 31. g4 d5 32. Nxd5 Rf8 33. Ne3
Rc7 34. Nf5+ Rxf5 35. gxf5 c4 36. f6 Kh5 37. Be5 c3 38. Bxc7 Bxf6 39. bxc3
a5 40. Bxa5 b2 41. Rb1 g4 42. Rxb2 g3 43. Rb5+ Kh6 44. hxg3 hxg3 45. fxg3
Kg7 46. Rb7+ Be7 47. Rxe7+ Kf6 48. Re8 Ke5 49. e7 Kf6 50. Bb4 Ke5 51. Rd8
Kxe4 52. e8=Q+ Kf5 53. Qf7+ Kg5 54. Rg8+ Kh6 55. Bf8# {Black checkmated} 1-0

Next round will be a test as we have the black pieces against a recovering HIARCS who dispatched the TD's engine Telepath.
Parent - - By Nick (****) [gb] Date 2008-06-21 19:09 Edited 2008-06-21 20:05
The Hamsters have played a reasonable opening. (1.d4 d5 game ..)

EDIT: 0-1.  HIARCS fought really well, but absolute and unadulterated class from Rybka, hats off to Vas and Larry.  Just look at move 54 from black! Well timed and brilliant, freestyle-like.  This game completes Phase One in our revenge on HIARCS for CCT10 :)

TimmelJ(64): Rybka bringing it home.... brutal

[Event "ICC tourney 864 (25 4 u)"]
[Site "Internet Chess Club"]
[Date "2008.06.21"]
[Round "6"]
[White "Hiarcs8x"]
[Black "Rybka"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ICCResult "White checkmated"]
[WhiteElo "2817"]
[BlackElo "2821"]
[Opening "QGD semi-Slav"]
[ECO "D43"]
[NIC "SL.03"]
[Time "15:02:30"]
[TimeControl "1500+4"]

1. d4 d5 2. c4 c6 3. Nf3 Nf6 4. Nc3 e6 5. Bg5 h6 6. Bxf6 Qxf6 7. e3 Nd7 8.
Bd3 dxc4 9. Bxc4 g6 10. O-O Bg7 11. Rc1 Qe7 12. Qe2 O-O 13. Rfd1 a6 14. Qc2
b6 15. Bd3 Bb7 16. Qa4 Rac8 17. b4 Rfd8 18. a3 e5 19. Be4 exd4 20. exd4 Nf8
21. Qc2 Ne6 22. Ne2 Re8 23. Ng3 Ng5 24. Nxg5 Qxg5 25. Bf3 Re7 26. Qd3 Rd8
27. Ne2 Qf6 28. a4 Qd6 29. Qd2 Rde8 30. a5 b5 31. Rc5 Bf8 32. h3 Qf6 33. Rb1
Re6 34. Rc2 Bd6 35. Qc3 h5 36. Ng3 Bf4 37. Rd1 Qd8 38. Nf1 Qe7 39. Rd3 Re1
40. Rd1 Rxd1 41. Bxd1 Qe1 42. Qxe1 Rxe1 43. Bf3 Re6 44. Ne3 Bd6 45. Rb2 Bf8
46. Kf1 Rd6 47. Rd2 Kg7 48. Nc2 Bc8 49. Rd1 Be6 50. Ke2 Kh6 51. Kd2 h4 52.
Kc3 f5 53. Na1 g5 54. Nc2 g4 55. Be2 Kg5 56. Rf1 Bg7 57. f4+ Kg6 58. Rh1 g3
59. Bf3 Bh6 60. Re1 Bxf4 61. Na1 Bg5 62. Nb3 Bf6 63. Rd1 f4 64. Nc5 Bd5 65.
Ne4 Re6 66. Kd3 Be7 67. Rb1 Bf8 68. Rb2 Bc4+ 69. Kc2 Kf5 70. Nd2 Be2 71. Kb1
Bd3+ 72. Ka2 Kg6 73. Bd1 Re1 74. Bg4 Bg7 75. Rb3 Re3 76. Ka3 Bxd4 77. Bf3 c5
78. bxc5 Bxc5+ 79. Kb2 Bd4+ 80. Ka2 Bf5 81. Rxe3 fxe3 82. Nb3 Be6 83. Ka3
Bc3 84. Nc1 Bc4 85. Bd1 Bd5 86. Bf3 Bxf3 87. gxf3 g2 88. Ne2 Kf5 89. Kb3
Bxa5 90. Nd4+ Kf4 91. Kc2 b4 92. Kd3 b3 93. Ne2+ Kxf3 94. Ng1+ Kf2 95. Ne2
b2 96. Nf4 b1=Q+ 97. Kd4 Bb6+ 98. Kd5 g1=Q 99. Ne6 Qb5+ 100. Kd6 e2 101. Ke7
e1=Q 102. Kd6 Qee5+ 103. Ke7 Qgg7# {White checkmated} 0-1

(Rybka-Sjeng coming up)
Parent - - By Sesse (****) [us] Date 2008-06-21 19:27 Edited 2008-06-21 20:04
Both engines seemed to agree that Rybka was better off by half a pawn or so in a rather defensive game (nobody even crossed the middle line until the 20th move). The score is dropping, though, so nothing is decided yet.

Edit: +5 for Rybka now... Pretty much game, set and match. Nice!

Edit 2: You have to admire the ending... Suddenly Rybka had three queens, almost as if to spite Hiarcs. "Look what my bishop pair turned into!" :-)

/* Steinar */
Parent - By Dark Horse (***) [in] Date 2008-06-21 20:01
well played
Parent - - By Nick (****) [gb] Date 2008-06-21 20:14 Edited 2008-06-21 20:16
Just chatting with Enrico, HIARCS was on 2 x 9775 @4.1 for this game.
Parent - - By Lukas Cimiotti (Bronze) [de] Date 2008-06-21 20:37
4.1 GHz is difficult to achieve. It only is possible if you overclock FSB - the Intel Skulltrail board doesn't like that too much. Under normal conditions it is best to stay at a FSB of 400 MHz and only raise multiplier. Btw my "big" Skulltrail reaches up to 4.2 GHz, but it has next to no advantage over the "little Skully" that is currently in use. That "little Skully" has the advantage of very good hand-picked memory modules running at really good timings. But anyway - Rybka is much much better than Hiarcs - you would have won with your own computer as well - I think. :)
Parent - - By Nick (****) [gb] Date 2008-06-21 20:43
Your machine is truly awesome Lukas :)  Rybka on it is slicing thru the competition.

Enrico says his ambient temp is 21-22c and his cpu's run at under 50 full load (2 apogee gtx waterblocks). Mult x FSB = 10 x 410.  I can't recall if your Big Skulltrail is on water or air?
Parent - - By Lukas Cimiotti (Bronze) [de] Date 2008-06-21 20:50
My big Skulltrail is on water (2 Apogee GTX waterblocks ;) ) and a Mora2 Radiator (not Morra ;) ) with 8 12 cm fans (max 9).
I didn't read anything about that tournament on Hiarcs Forum - now I understand why :)
Carry on Nick
Parent - - By Dark Horse (***) [in] Date 2008-06-21 20:52
Kullberg actually there is a thread about this tournament on the HIARCS forum
Parent - - By Lukas Cimiotti (Bronze) [de] Date 2008-06-21 21:01
I looked for it and I didn't find any. Could you please give me the link?
Parent - - By Lukas Cimiotti (Bronze) [de] Date 2008-06-21 21:13
Thanks a lot
looks like they didn't make it sticky as they won't win :)
Parent - By Dark Horse (***) [in] Date 2008-06-21 21:17
depends lets wait and see where we finish up
Parent - - By Nick (****) [gb] Date 2008-06-21 20:32 Edited 2008-06-21 21:10
Round 7 against Sjeng looking reasonably good, Rybka made a > +0.5 book exit and is currently evaluating +1.04 at move 12

TimmelJ(64): Rybka - in the middlegame,,,the way it tied up Black's pieces...

Sjeng bites the dust, comprehensively outplayed.  Rybka 7/7.

[Event "ICC tourney 864 (25 4 u)"]
[Site "Internet Chess Club"]
[Date "2008.06.21"]
[Round "7"]
[White "Rybka"]
[Black "Sjeng"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ICCResult "Black resigns"]
[WhiteElo "2821"]
[BlackElo "2720"]
[Opening "King's pawn opening"]
[ECO "B07"]
[NIC "VO.17"]
[Time "16:24:39"]
[TimeControl "1500+4"]

1. e4 d6 2. Nc3 g6 3. Nf3 Nd7 4. d4 Bg7 5. Be2 c5 6. dxc5 Bxc3+ 7. bxc3 Nxc5
8. e5 a6 9. O-O dxe5 10. Qxd8+ Kxd8 11. Nxe5 Be6 12. Be3 Rc8 13. Nd3 Ne4 14.
Bf3 Ngf6 15. Rfe1 Nd6 16. Bb6+ Ke8 17. Bd4 Rf8 18. Nc5 Nd5 19. Re5 Nc7 20.
a4 Rb8 21. Ree1 Kd8 22. Rab1 Kc8 23. a5 Ba2 24. Ra1 Bd5 25. Rxe7 Bxf3 26.
Nd7 Kd8 27. Bf6 Nd5 28. Rxf7+ Nxf6 29. Rxf8+ Kxd7 30. Rxb8 Be4 31. Rc1 h5
32. f3 Bf5 33. h3 Kc7 34. Rf8 Nd5 35. g4 Be6 36. Re1 Kd7 37. Rh8 Nf6 38. g5
Nd5 39. Rh7+ Ne7 40. Rd1 Bg8 41. Rg7 Bc4 42. f4 Be6 43. Kg2 Bg8 44. Kf2 Be6
45. f5 gxf5 46. Ke3 Ba2 47. Kf4 Ke6 48. Re1+ Ne4 49. Rxe7+ Kxe7 50. Kxf5
Be6+ 51. Kxe4 Bxh3 52. Rb1 Bc8 53. Rf1 Bh3 54. Rf4 Bd7 55. g6 Ba4 56. g7
Bxc2+ 57. Ke5 Bh7 58. Rf8 h4 59. Rh8 Bg8 60. Rxg8 Kf7 61. Rh8 Kxg7
{Black resigns}
1-0
Parent - - By Sesse (****) [us] Date 2008-06-21 21:14
I must admit that as an unregistered ICC user (who cannot kibitz or whisper or even send messages to people) it is a bit frustrating with all the people kibitzing "OH LOOK Rybka is at +4 but Sjeng is at -4, clearly one of the evaluations must be completely wrong!!11". :-)

/* Steinar */
Parent - - By Dark Horse (***) [in] Date 2008-06-21 21:18
arent each of the evals from the engines point of view ? so if Rybka says +4 and Sjeng -4 then it is the same thing ?
Parent - - By Sesse (****) [us] Date 2008-06-21 21:25
Yes, usually. (Some of the engines, like Crafty, differ, though, probably for using a different GUI or protocol.) The problem is that people don't seem to understand this, and the commentary thus becomes, err, less than intelligent. And as an unregistered user, I have no ability to communicate with these people...

("But, someone's WRONG on the Internet!" comes to mind.)

/* Steinar */
Parent - By Vempele (Silver) [fi] Date 2008-06-21 21:28 Edited 2008-06-21 21:33

> ("But, someone's WRONG on the Internet!" comes to mind.)


How to be an asshole when you aren't allowed to talk? :)

For those who don't get it.
Parent - - By Sesse (****) [us] Date 2008-06-21 22:01 Edited 2008-06-21 22:08
Diep-Rybka. Rybka out-booked Diep by quite a bit, giving it five more minutes on the clock and a roughly equal evaluation as black. At some point, Diep sacrificed a knight (against a pawn) in what looked like an attempt at an attack, but then its evaluation suddenly dropped (from about equal to -1.8) and now both engines seem to think Rybka is winning (+3.30 for Rybka, -3.532 for Diep).

Edit: It should be mentioned that Diep is running on quite inferior hardware (dual Athlon MP 2600+) by modern standards. That alone makes it really hard to try to challenge the eight-core monster used for Rybka :-)

Edit 2: Yet, it saw the mate in 17 while Rybka was still searching at depth 8. Sounds a bit weird to me. But 0-1 and perfect score for Rybka the first day. Congrats!

/* Steinar */
Parent - - By Nick (****) [gb] Date 2008-06-21 22:14
Thanks Steinar, Rybka 3 beta is a beast !
Parent - By Sesse (****) [us] Date 2008-06-21 23:12
I'm also pretty sure the book doesn't hurt. :-)

/* Steinar */
Parent - - By Nick (****) [gb] Date 2008-06-21 22:11
DIEP - Rybka .. 0-1.   Arturo is booking for Vincent and had apparently lost the same opening in an earlier round.   He's provoked a rather unorthodox line here which will probably need tuned out .. I need to check :)

[Event "ICC tourney 864 (25 4 u)"]
[Site "Internet Chess Club"]
[Date "2008.06.21"]
[Round "8"]
[White "DIEP"]
[Black "Rybka"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ICCResult "White checkmated"]
[WhiteElo "2572"]
[BlackElo "2821"]
[Opening "Catalan: open, 5.Nf3"]
[ECO "E04"]
[NIC "CA.03"]
[Time "17:33:44"]
[TimeControl "1500+4"]

1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 d5 4. g3 dxc4 5. Bg2 a6 6. Ne5 c5 7. Be3 Nd5 8.
Nc3 Nxe3 9. fxe3 Ra7 10. O-O f6 11. Qa4+ Nd7 12. Nf3 Be7 13. Qxc4 Nb6 14.
Qd3 O-O 15. b3 cxd4 16. exd4 Bd7 17. Rac1 Be8 18. Bh3 Bf7 19. e3 Re8 20. Rc2
Ra8 21. Rcf2 Bb4 22. Nh4 Rc8 23. Ne4 Nd7 24. Rf4 Rc7 25. Qb1 a5 26. R4f3 f5
27. Nxf5 exf5 28. Bxf5 Nf8 29. h4 Bd5 30. Rf4 Kh8 31. Kh2 Qe7 32. h5 Rc6 33.
Nc5 Bxc5 34. dxc5 Ne6 35. Bxe6 Bxe6 36. Qd1 h6 37. e4 Rxc5 38. R1f2 Qg5 39.
Qd2 Qxh5+ 40. Rh4 Qg6 41. b4 Rg5 42. Qd6 axb4 43. a3 b3 44. a4 Rc8 45. Qf4
Rc2 46. Kg2 b2 47. Rxc2 b1=Q 48. Rf2 Rxg3+ 49. Qxg3 Qg1+ 50. Kxg1 Qxg3+ 51.
Kh1 Qxf2 52. Rh5 Qf3+ 53. Kh2 Qxh5+ 54. Kg3 Qg4+ 55. Kf2 Qxe4 56. a5 g5 57.
a6 bxa6 58. Kg3 Qf4+ 59. Kg2 Bd5+ 60. Kg1 Qg3+ 61. Kf1 Bc4# {White
checkmated} 0-1

So we are 8/8, not a bad day :)  Six more rounds to play tomorrow, I will post the grid later tonight when the round finishes, right now I need to pop to a friends house to feed their cats.
Parent - By Felix Kling (Gold) [de] Date 2008-06-21 22:34
"So we are 8/8, not a bad day"

That was the minimum we all expected ;)
Parent - - By Jeroen (*****) [nl] Date 2008-06-21 22:41
Hi Nick,

Superb show sofar, the 8/8 score at least make me happy after the deserved loss by 'Oranje' against Russia in Euro 2008 :-).

Best regards, Jeroen
Parent - - By Dragon Mist (****) [hr] Date 2008-06-21 22:44
Jeroen,

it's nothing compared to how we feel over here, having lost last night to Turkey. :-(
Parent - By Jeroen (*****) [nl] Date 2008-06-21 22:48
Yes, I can imagine. The teams that did so well in the group phase all seem to get eliminated. If Italy beats Spain, all the numbers two in the groups are in the semi finals.....

Sleep well tonight!
Parent - By Nick (****) [gb] Date 2008-06-21 23:15
Hoi Jeroen, yes I watched the game live, my ... condolencies.  Still, I hope your trip to Amsterdam was fruitfull in other areas ;)
Parent - By Vasik Rajlich (Silver) [hu] Date 2008-06-22 08:44

> Superb show sofar, the 8/8 score at least make me happy after the deserved loss by 'Oranje' against Russia in Euro 2008 .


True enough. From about the 60-minute mark on the Russian team played really well. The ups-and-downs of sport ...

Vas
Parent - - By Nick (****) [gb] Date 2008-06-22 00:33
standings for round 8 (of 14)

>   8.0 Rybka
>   6.0 Hiarcs8x
>   5.5 Sjeng
>   5.0 TerraPi DIEP ArasanX crafty ChessThinkerX TwistedLogic Telepath
>   4.5 TheGiver Amateur apocalypse1112
>   4.0 Deuterium2003 Yace Tinker Frenzee Symbolic Bugchess2 zct messchess
>   3.5 PetirX Timea BertaX Matilde
>   3.0 Tornado-C ProphetX NeurosisX OxygenX
>   2.5 DeltomateX JokerX
>   2.0 HfC Buzz
>   1.5 Horizon-x NoonianChess
>   0.0 roce


>     Name                  R1    R2    R3    R4    R5    R6    R7    R8    Score  #g


=====================================================================================

>   1 Rybka          (2821) +w26  +b22  +w4   +b15  +w11  +b2   +w3   +b5     8.0   8
>   2 Hiarcs8x       (2817) +b21  -w5   +b18  +w6   +b10  -w1   +b15  +w4     6.0   8
>   3 Sjeng          (2720) =b14  +w34  =b5   +w12  +b15  +w4   -b1   =w9     5.5   8
>   4 TerraPi        (2646) +b18  +w6   -b1   +w17  +b7   -b3   +w11  -b2     5.0   8
>   5 DIEP           (2572) +w25  +b2   =w3   -w11  +b19  =b6   +b7   -w1     5.0   8
>   6 ArasanX        (2526) +w23  -b4   +w14  -b2   +b16  =w5   =b8   +w15    5.0   8
>   7 crafty         (2591) +b35  +w10  =b11  =w8   -w4   +b14  -w5   +b19    5.0   8
>   8 ChessThinkerX  (2946) =w9   =b14  +w13  =b7   +w30  -b11  =w6   +b16    5.0   8
>   9 TwistedLogic   (2426) =b8   -w12  +b34  =w16  +b25  =w17  +w22  =b3     5.0   8
>  10 Telepath       (2416) +w33  -b7   +w32  +b20  -w2   -w15  +b18  +b21    5.0   8
>  11 TheGiver       (2735) +w16  +b24  =w7   +b5   -b1   +w8   -b4    w17    4.5   7
>  12 Amateur        (2492) -w32  +b9   +w28  -b3   =w18  -b22  +w30  +b24    4.5   8
>  13 apocalypse1112 (2327) -b17  +w27  -b8   -w25  +b35  +w34  =w24  +b22    4.5   8
>  14 Deuterium2003  (2359) =w3   =w8   -b6   +b23  +w24  -w7   -b21  Ww29    4.0   7
>  15 Yace           (2601) +w36  +b28  +b17  -w1   -w3   +b10  -w2   -b6     4.0   8
>  16 Tinker         (2381) -b11  =w19  +b27  =b9   -w6   +b26  +w20  -w8     4.0   8
>  17 Frenzee        (2662) +w13  +b32  -w15  -b4   +w20  =b9   =w19   b11    4.0   7
>  18 Symbolic       (2313) -w4   +b33  -w2   +b32  =b12  =w21  -w10  +w27    4.0   8
>  19 Bugchess2      (2000) -w24  =b16  +w33  +b22  -w5   +b30  =b17  -w7     4.0   8
>  20 zct            (2270) -w22  +b26  +w24  -w10  -b17  +w27  -b16  +b30    4.0   8
>  21 messchess      (2399) -w2   +b36  =w22  -b30  +w23  =b18  +w14  -w10    4.0   8
>  22 PetirX         (2540) +b20  -w1   =b21  -w19  +b34  +w12  -b9   -w13    3.5   8
>  23 Timea          (2157) -b6   +b25  =w30  -w14  -b21  +w28  -b29  +w31    3.5   8
>  24 BertaX         (2511) +b19  -w11  -b20  +w35  -b14  +w25  =b13  -w12    3.5   8
>  25 Matilde        (2278) -b5   -w23  +w36  +b13  -w9   -b24  =b31  +w33    3.5   8
>  26 Tornado-C      (2413) -b1   -w20  -b35  +b33  +w28  -w16  -b27  +w32    3.0   8
>  27 ProphetX       (2441) -w28  -b13  -w16  +b36  +w32  -b20  +w26  -b18    3.0   8
>  28 NeurosisX      (2000) +b27  -w15  -b12  =w34  -b26  -b23  =w35  +w36    3.0   8
>  29 OxygenX        (2454)                         +w36  +b32  +w23  Lb14    3.0   3
>  30 DeltomateX     (2458) -b34  +w35  =b23  +w21  -b8   -w19  -b12  -w20    2.5   8
>  31 JokerX         (2345)                         +w33  +b35  =w25  -b23    2.5   4
>  32 HfC            (2000) +b12  -w17  -b10  -w18  -b27  -w29  +b36  -b26    2.0   8
>  33 Buzz           (2829) -b10  -w18  -b19  -w26  -b31  +w36  +b34  -b25    2.0   8
>  34 Horizon-x      (2000) +w30  -b3   -w9   =b28  -w22  -b13  -w33   w35    1.5   7
>  35 NoonianChess   (2281) -w7   -b30  +w26  -b24  -w13  -w31  =b28   b34    1.5   7
>  36 roce           (2283) -b15  -w21  -b25  -w27  -b29  -b33  -w32  -b28    0.0   8

Parent - By Permanent Brain (*****) Date 2008-06-22 01:41
Fabulous. Not only that Rybka has 8.0/8, she has also already won against the current ranks 2,3,4 and 5. :-D

It's just another exhibition!
Parent - By Vasik Rajlich (Silver) [hu] Date 2008-06-22 08:40
Good luck today Nick!

Vas
Parent - - By Nelson Hernandez (Silver) [us] Date 2008-06-21 22:31
For the record, I have not inspired Armando since.  He is a very suggestible character.  Someone should write him in Spanish and suggest that he try 1.d4.
Parent - By Nick (****) [gb] Date 2008-06-21 23:15
Hehe, I now have this image of you as Hannibal Lecter.
Parent - - By Arifur (**) [ie] Date 2008-06-21 15:50
Thanks for the games. Looking at the website I am not totally sure, is Rybka running on 4 cores and Hiarcs is running on 8 cores?
Parent - - By Nick (****) [gb] Date 2008-06-21 15:54
We have quite a complicated set-up, but Rybka is on 8 cores @3.8 (Lukas' "Little Scully" machine, he can tell you more about it I guess) and I believe that HIARCS is also on 8 cores as per the ACCA website.
Parent - - By M ANSARI (*****) [kw] Date 2008-06-21 22:10
Good results guys ... seems like a cake walk for Rybka. I am a little confused why Hiarcs 8 is playing ... or is the newest Hiarcs playing?  And I guess now the standard hardware for engines to be competitive must be 8 cores.  8 cores overclocked really are a big boost for chess engines and the Skulltrail platform is perfect for chess.  I am surprised of the 4.1 Ghz ... how do you overclock the memory on the 5400XS ... I couldn't find that option in the BIOS.  I managed to get 4.2 Ghz on air ... but it is not 100% stable (although almost).  I guess maybe with lapping and using better HSF it is a very reasonable goal.
Parent - By Nick (****) [gb] Date 2008-06-21 22:13
Hey thanks Majd, they were using the latest development version of HIARCS.   Perhaps Lukas can address your hardware questions, I think 4.2 on air could be pushing it for 100% stability?
Parent - By Lukas Cimiotti (Bronze) [de] Date 2008-06-22 07:41
Some memory modules work at 410 MHz, most don't.
In my 2 D5400XS boards I use handpicked modules that run CL 4-4-4 at 400 MHz. This should be faster than CL5-5-5 at 410 MHz.
I didn't reach 4.2 GHz on air but with good water cooling it worked, but VCore was too high (1.45V). So I returned to 4.0 GHz.
Parent - - By Nick (****) [gb] Date 2008-06-22 07:46
Also Majd, did you ever get your custom dual phase running on your Skulltrail?  If so what ghz did it manage?
Parent - - By M ANSARI (*****) [kw] Date 2008-06-22 08:04 Edited 2008-06-22 08:08
Oh yes ... I got to 5.2 Ghz ... but really I was only able to be 100% stable at 4.8 Ghz (I will email you the Fritzmark pix).  I had tried two different insulation methods on the CPU's ... one of them was 10C better so that probably slowed things down a bit ... so I took it all apart to redo both processors equal... I should work on it in a week or two and this time I hope to get my earlier goal of 5 Ghz on 8 cores stable.  The idea is to get this performance 24/7 and not simply to benchmark.  I am pretty sure I can get 5Ghz very stable as the design of the phase change I did had absolutely no problem keeping temps at the highest loads (2 x 1hp compressors versus Vapochill LS 1/3hp) ... I think it only dropped like 3C on load versus the Vapochill which would drop 20 or 30C.  At 4.8 Ghz the Fritzmark was 42.92 and something like 20600 knps !!! Also on Playchess some people were telling me I was getting more knps that a 16 core system with Zappa when I used it in a non Rybka tourney there.  It is a monster indeed.

As for the memory ... I used Mushkin memory which seemed quite good and can run perfectely at 4 4 4 12 ... but I did not see any performance difference.  I used a laser temp gun on the MCH ... and boy that thing gets really hot.  I do think there is a big pefromance gain to be achieved by sub zero cooling the MCH and memory modules.  But again this would make the project very complicated ... maybe I could watercool the MCH ... and the memory modules instead of phase cooling them ... we will see.  Already I am thinking of Nehalem.
Parent - By irvstein1 (***) [us] Date 2008-06-22 23:53
wow that seems like alot to go through,how much actual elo are we talking about between 4.8 and the 5 you are wanting ?? to me either one will be strong the elo gain cant be that much ?
Parent - - By Patricio (***) [ar] Date 2008-06-22 02:05
Hi,

Is possible to see the games online?

Best regards,

                              Patricio.
Parent - - By dragon49 (****) [us] Date 2008-06-22 03:07
The Games are on ICC - If you can figure out what numbers they are.  If you so - reply.
Parent - - By Sesse (****) [us] Date 2008-06-22 15:53
"observe Rybka" (or shorten "observe" to "ob") and you'll get her game. If you are registered, you can also "follow Rybka"; otherwise there seems to be no good solution except to hammer. :-/

/* Steinar */
Up Topic Rybka Support & Discussion / Rybka Discussion / 2008 Second Annual World Computer Rapid Chess Championships
1 2 3 4 5 Previous Next  

Powered by mwForum 2.27.4 © 1999-2012 Markus Wichitill