Topic Rybka Support & Discussion / Rybka Discussion / rybka may lose the first place in the ssdf list to hiarcs
http://www.chessusa.com/SSDF.html
1 Rybka 2.3.1 Arena 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2935 34 -32 509 70% 2783
2 Rybka 1.2 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2902 26 -25 845 72% 2740
3 Hiarcs 11.1 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2869 29 -28 616 62% 2783
It seems that hiarcs11.2 on 4*2400 is better than rybka2.3.1 32 bits on A1200 and based on results that I see there are no games for newer rybka than rybka2.3.1 on better hardware than A1200.
I expect hiarcs to win the match and
result so far is:
Hiarcs 11.2 MP Q6600 - Rybka 2.3.1 A1200 8.5:4.5
Q6600 = Quad 4 x 2.4 GHz
http://64.68.157.89/forum/viewtopic.php?topic_view=threads&p=164555&t=18484
Uri
1 Rybka 2.3.1 Arena 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2935 34 -32 509 70% 2783
2 Rybka 1.2 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2902 26 -25 845 72% 2740
3 Hiarcs 11.1 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2869 29 -28 616 62% 2783
It seems that hiarcs11.2 on 4*2400 is better than rybka2.3.1 32 bits on A1200 and based on results that I see there are no games for newer rybka than rybka2.3.1 on better hardware than A1200.
I expect hiarcs to win the match and
result so far is:
Hiarcs 11.2 MP Q6600 - Rybka 2.3.1 A1200 8.5:4.5
Q6600 = Quad 4 x 2.4 GHz
http://64.68.157.89/forum/viewtopic.php?topic_view=threads&p=164555&t=18484
Uri
MP Q6600 vs. A1200?! That's not exatctly the kind of test I would use for a serious rating list, i guess they will also test Rybka on this machine before releasing the ratinglist.
They should wait until ALL major mp capable engines they test, have enough games on their quads. Otherwise, the list needs to be devided in hardware sections (something that SSDF never has done before).
It's widely known that this rating list is strongly outdated. (Does it still exist?)
Of course the ssdf list exists and it is not strongly outdated.
last ssdf list is from november 2007.
Uri
last ssdf list is from november 2007.
Uri
Actually, this could be used as an alternate method of rating engines, i.e. how much faster does the hardware for engine a need to be to have it play at the same level as engine b.
Alan
Alan
It is good to know that SSDF finally upgraded their machines. After all, I think that it was already necessary.
I also expect Hiarcs 11.2 MP to win, but hope to see enough games of the Rybka newest version running in the Q6600 too.
I enjoy to see they are working again; a rating list based only under slow time controls are quite necessary in my opinion. Thanks for the note.
Regards,
Gaмßito.
I also expect Hiarcs 11.2 MP to win, but hope to see enough games of the Rybka newest version running in the Q6600 too.
I enjoy to see they are working again; a rating list based only under slow time controls are quite necessary in my opinion. Thanks for the note.
Regards,
Gaмßito.
Uri, Bah, who care about such a result. It will please Harvey though.
Wayne
Wayne
Topic Rybka Support & Discussion / Rybka Discussion / rybka may lose the first place in the ssdf list to hiarcs
Powered by mwForum 2.27.4 © 1999-2012 Markus Wichitill