By John Hyden Date 2007-10-05 19:21
Games should be sorted according to their quality. If we/I mean high quality games it should not be only based on elo because there are still some games without elo or improper elo that is considered high quality (freestyle for example). Lets say rybka will analyze a database, the user will set the time, threshold, include variations and other weights such that it will know which to consider a blunder or not. And after the game has been analyze it will conclude the blunders/scores per position based on the users settings then rate it. For example number 1 is the most high quality game and number 10 is the lowest quality game. Extra comments should be also added based on the conclusion like if it is a novelty, modelgame, tactical blunder etc.
Powered by mwForum 2.27.4 © 1999-2012 Markus Wichitill