I have been using the 'Find Blunders' feature to look through my son's games - and this is obviously great at finding 'Blunders' however just highlighting errors is very negative. Looking at the report he got back on one of his games from a coach, the report was much more balanced praising the good moves as well as highlighting the errors. This got me thinking, it can't be that difficult to implement analysis that looks through a game and highlights the moves where the move played was the best move by more than a certain margin?

Ideally the find blunders / good moves would be combined so I did not need to merge the analysis but that would just be 'icing on the cake'

Thoughs?

We tend to focus on computer v computer and correspondence play but analysis tools for humans are certainly lacking, or at least I have not found anything that good yet.

Shaun

P.S. As I mentioned in another post restricting the anaysis to a phase of a game even crudely, e.g. moves a-b, would also save analysis time.