Not logged inRybka Chess Community Forum
Up Topic Correspondence Chess / Correspondence Chess / turbojuice1122 vs. SchachProfi challenge: Fried Liver-Attack
1 2 3 4 Previous Next  
- - By SchachProfi (****) [de] Date 2010-04-29 01:00
Dear friends of entertaining correspondence-chess,

let us welcome you to a two-game series roundabout the Fried Liver-Attack
and the Lolli-Attack, being one alternative therefore in white's play, between
Jason (turbojuice1122) and Alexander (SchachProfi) arisen out of an emotional
discussion in http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=16390

Alexander will kindly be second by rybkaforum-correspondence GM omprakash
and is already looking forward to analyze with him: Welcome on board, Om!
Jason can name a second whenever he wants to.

The games will start whenever Jason wants, Game 1 being the first game to start.
There are no strict time rules, just a common try to get one move each ~24/48h
on the board, and the possibility to get a few days of just by noting the other.

The two-game series turbojuice1122 vs. SchachProfi consists of the following games:

Game 1: SchachProfi - turbojuice1122 (C57 Two Knights: Lolli-Attack Nxd4):
Lolli-Attack-Nxd4 (1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Nf6 4. Ng5 d5 5. exd5 Nxd5 6. d4 Nxd4 *)

Game 2: turbojuice1122 - SchachProfi (C57 Two Knights: Fried-Liver Attack Kxf7):
Fried Liver-Attack-Kxf7 (1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Nf6 4. Ng5 d5 5. exd5 Nxd5 6. Nxf7 Kxf7 *)

Additional lines regarding the Fried Liver-Attack and white's alternatives to 6. Nxf7 may
be provided while play to create a mostly complete look to this Two Knights Ng5 opening.

Everyone is free and heartly invited to comment on "old" positions,
have fun playing, analyzing and watching!

Alexander and Jason

---

Board of Game 1:

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Nf6 4. Ng5 d5 5. exd5 Nxd5 6. 6. d4 Nxd4 *

r1bqkb1r/ppp2ppp/8/3np1N1/2Bn4/8/PPP2PPP/RNBQK2R w KQkq - 0 7


Board of Game 2:

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Nf6 4. Ng5 d5 5. exd5 Nxd5 6. Nxf7 Kxf7 *

r1bq1b1r/ppp2kpp/2n5/3np3/2B5/8/PPPP1PPP/RNBQK2R w KQ - 0 7
Parent - By turbojuice1122 (Gold) [us] Date 2010-04-29 13:13
Thanks again for setting this up.  My guess is I'll be ready to begin Game 1 by around the middle of next week.
Parent - - By turbojuice1122 (Gold) [us] Date 2010-05-02 03:26
Since I will be doing a lot of things during the summer, it's probably a good idea to start as soon as possible, which means now.  I am ready. :-)  Good luck!
Parent - - By Uly (Gold) [mx] Date 2010-05-02 05:49
Good luck turboJ., my money is on you! ;)
Parent - By turbojuice1122 (Gold) [us] Date 2010-05-02 10:29
Thank you, though my money is on two draws! :-D
Parent - - By Highendman (****) Date 2010-05-03 23:28
On your game 2 - starting with 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Nf6 4. Ng5 d5 5. exd5 Nxd5 6. Nxf7 Kxf7 *
I've won at least 30+ games I can remember using this line, when I was 12 years old :)
But as I grew older and faced tougher opposition - they either avoided this line or knew how to refute it - and I realized White at best draws it.
So I moved to other less traversed roads. Would be fun to watch when you play it - maybe you find some new life in this treaded road.
Parent - By SchachProfi (****) [de] Date 2010-05-04 15:39
I'm already looking forward to play it, especially as it is regarded being won for white now for centuries, and people told me Jason is one of the best and will find a win if there is a win there to be found, and he already promised "good advantages" in the Fried-Liver Attack for white... Alex

btw., i can only underline "Show me a good loser and I'll show you a loser."
- By ppipper (*****) [es] Date 2010-04-29 08:32
Looking forward for next moves

Good luck!
- - By SchachProfi (****) [de] Date 2010-05-02 17:00
@ppipper: Thanks for your kind wishes, i hope you will crack Uly's KID! :-)

@Uly: Thanks for your best wishes! ;-)

@Jason: My guess is that both sides of black have to struggle, of course the Lolli more than the Fried Liver (which is my main message and our topic of discussion here: Lolli is better than Fried Liver!?)... ;-) As i already guess that you want another shot on the Lolli soon (besides Nxd4) i will post my thinkings about these alternatives later... but be sure they're equally as weak, simply because the Lolli rulez!

Here we go...

Board of Game 1:

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Nf6 4. Ng5 d5 5. exd5 Nxd5 6. 6. d4 Nxd4 7. c3 *

r1bqkb1r/ppp2ppp/8/3np1N1/2Bn4/2P5/PP3PPP/RNBQK2R b KQkq - 0 7


I played 7. c3 pretty blind as there is only one semi-equal possibility in 7. O-O which i consider as weak already, everything else i very weak.

Alex
Parent - - By turbojuice1122 (Gold) [us] Date 2010-05-02 18:25
I have checked out black's other replies by now, and I think that 6...Nxd4 is black's best chance for equality, so that move isn't really an issue.  Also, I agree that 7.c3 is definitely white's only way to go here--with 7.0-0, black may get a slight advantage already.

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Nf6 4. Ng5 d5 5. exd5 Nxd5 6. 6. d4 Nxd4 7. c3 b5
Parent - - By SchachProfi (****) [de] Date 2010-05-02 20:00
Only 8. Bd3 makes sense to me here (i also looked at Bxd5, O-O, cxd4 and Bf1)

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Nf6 4. Ng5 d5 5. exd5 Nxd5 6. 6. d4 Nxd4 7. c3 b5 8. Bd3 *
Parent - - By turbojuice1122 (Gold) [us] Date 2010-05-02 20:40 Edited 2010-05-02 20:56
Here, 8...c6 (blocking the diagonal from a potential bishop on e4) seems a waste of critical time, while 8...Nf4 cannot really avoid an exchange sacrifice (which I don't like here) after 9.Be4.  Thus...

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Nf6 4. Ng5 d5 5. exd5 Nxd5 6. d4 Nxd4 7. c3 b5 8. Bd3 h6

And this is now the position of our initial argument. :-)

Edited to correct the number duplication at move 6.
Parent - - By keoki010 (Silver) [us] Date 2010-05-02 20:45
Here's a corrected pgn for both of you 'docs'. :lol:  the one you're posting ain't good. :wink:

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Nf6 4. Ng5 d5 5. exd5 Nxd5 6. d4 Nxd4 7. c3 b5 8. Bd3 h6
Parent - - By turbojuice1122 (Gold) [us] Date 2010-05-02 20:55
Whoops, thank you!  Obviously, as you see, we were both just doing a copy/paste. :-)
Parent - By keoki010 (Silver) [us] Date 2010-05-02 21:06
been there, done that :lol:
Parent - - By SchachProfi (****) [de] Date 2010-05-02 21:59
@keoki:This is a feature of pgn-format version 17.943836 which i used here to underline the (devilish-)importance of the 6th move, seems it's time for you to update! ;-) And yes, you get your game with the winner of this challenge... :lol:

@Jason: Nice to see you holding on your line, now my thinking begins... haven't had a look at it until now in just a few seconds...

Alex
Parent - - By keoki010 (Silver) [us] Date 2010-05-03 17:08

> @keoki:This is a feature of pgn-format version 17.943836 which i used here to underline the (devilish-)importance of the 6th move, seems it's time for you to update! <IMG class="sic sic_sml_wnk" alt=;-) src="/mwf/epx.png"> And yes, you get your game with the winner of this challenge... <IMG class="fsm fsm_lol" title=lol alt="" src="/mwf/epx.png">
>


Whoa, I was merely pointing out that the pgn you pasted was not a correct one.  You couldn't cut & paste it into aquarium.  However I do accept your challenge...:smile: whenever you are ready to start.
  If your program put out that pgn then you will have to correct the program or get convekta to upgrade their format.  :wink: ;good luck on that!!!! :lol:
Parent - - By turbojuice1122 (Gold) [us] Date 2010-05-03 20:41
Sorry, I would not be able to accept that part of the challenge if I win--I already feel bad starting this match with so many other things going on.
Parent - - By keoki010 (Silver) [us] Date 2010-05-03 21:59
@jason: understand, will challenge alex, on opposite color

@alex: consider yourself challenged.
Parent - - By SchachProfi (****) [de] Date 2010-05-04 14:38
Hi keoki,

would you be interested in playing me in a two-game series also?
I could offer you defending my "primary-secondary" choice 9. Qh5 which i had to give up in this game here plus a second game we agree on:
Game 1 (you black): 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Nf6 4. Ng5 d5 5. exd5 Nxd5 6. d4 Nxd4 7. c3 b5 8. Bd3 h6 9. Qh5 *
Game 2 (you white): Two Knights Defense (1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Nf6 4. Ng5 d5 *) or what you wish and we agree on to play.

Could start Game 1 even now,

Alex
Parent - - By keoki010 (Silver) [us] Date 2010-05-04 17:18
Ok, as long as we can play them 1 at a time.  I have 24 rated games going on already. Plus 2 here and 1 on ficgs fun games. I'm starting to spend too much time on chess.  :smile: I'll set it up now on game 1 and make my move.
Parent - - By SchachProfi (****) [de] Date 2010-05-04 22:00
Nice, as i pointed out above i was already looking forward to give 9. Qh5 also an practical try... thanks for giving me the opportunity to. One game at once is fine, my time is pretty limited due Job/Chessultant/Hobbies&PlayingJason now.

You play 24 rated games at once? I guess you're student or retired... do you have some kind of management-software for this? :-)

Best wishes,

Alex
Parent - By keoki010 (Silver) [us] Date 2010-05-05 16:01

> You play 24 rated games at once? I guess you're student or retired... do you have some kind of management-software for this? <IMG class="sic sic_sml_pos" alt=:-) src="/mwf/epx.png">
>
>


I'm retired.  Use Chess Assistant and Aquarium.  I mirror the DB's. The only thing you have to watch is that Aq won't create a new DB by the same name as one already in CA.  Different dir's, but you'll get an error message if it's open.  Hadn't tried for a while, though, so maybe it's fixed. :smile:
- - By Uly (Gold) [mx] Date 2010-05-03 05:08
r1bqkb1r/p1p2pp1/7p/1p1np1N1/3n4/2PB4/PP3PPP/RNBQK2R w KQkq -
Parent - By NATIONAL12 (Gold) [gb] Date 2010-05-03 22:27
i think black can defend this.
Parent - - By NATIONAL12 (Gold) [gb] Date 2010-05-03 23:05
i know there is a choice of moves in this position but why is it taking an inaugurate amount of time for white to reply.surely he looked at this move.:)
Parent - - By turbojuice1122 (Gold) [us] Date 2010-05-03 23:10
The game has basically just begun, so he could very easily have been busy as we started, and this could still be the case--he was just responding with automatic, easy responses going into this critical position, and now the real fun begins.
Parent - - By SchachProfi (****) [de] Date 2010-05-04 03:55
@NATIONAL12: As i stated above - due fairplay - i started analyzing just with Jason's "Go", no home preparation here...

@Jason: Thanks for your kind understanding, i was pretty busy today because of the Greece-question and it was also a hell of a decision. Also i wanted to wait on Om's input, but i guess he is sleeping now :-)...
Parent - By turbojuice1122 (Gold) [us] Date 2010-05-04 09:50
Regarding Greece, did you make any slick moves? :-D
- - By SchachProfi (****) [de] Date 2010-05-04 03:56
This key-move of the game was a hell of a decision between Qh5, Nxf7 and Ne4; Nh7 and cxd4 already being weaker in my opinion.
Finally i had to say goodbye to two "friends" and selecting one of these three:

Board of Game 1:

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Nf6 4. Ng5 d5 5. exd5 Nxd5 6. d4 Nxd4 7. c3 b5 8. Bd3 h6 9. Nxf7 *

r1bqkb1r/p1p2Np1/7p/1p1np3/3n4/2PB4/PP3PPP/RNBQK2R b KQkq - 0 9
Parent - - By turbojuice1122 (Gold) [us] Date 2010-05-04 09:43
I thought that you would play this move.  I guess the Fried Liver isn't so bad after all? ;-)  When I started checking things out just before we started, I found this to give black the most trouble, and I think this is still the case.  Nonetheless...

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Nf6 4. Ng5 d5 5. exd5 Nxd5 6. d4 Nxd4 7. c3 b5 8. Bd3 h6 9. Nxf7 Kxf7
Parent - - By SchachProfi (****) [de] Date 2010-05-04 15:31
Regarding Greece: The biggest part of this Euro-downrun-wave (coming from 1.525-levels) should be over now, but there is still headroom down to the levels around EUR/USD 1.25, which already saw hugh buying-support in the financial crisis itself... the environment is pretty challenging, especially as all the corrupt banks and rating agencies try to manipulate quotes into their direction... so it's not about guessing a correct valuation but more what the Wallfrauds plan to do... will be interesting too see when the big inflation-wave will come... and it will come for sure... but thankfully inflations are just statistics and easily manipulitable by government :-).

Back to Chess: I had a pretty sleepless night because i had to drop Qh5, dropping Ne4 was pretty easy to me because it involved already so much pieces taken of the board, but not Qh5 *snive*... hopefully keoki or someone else will take my challenge (see above) and this one has not to get back just to my dark archives... Due to Chessultant-testing i'm only analyzing on a single computer here... even without GUI (just debugging console), but it's hell of fun... just like in the good old coding-days (where money didn't matter)... me being 30 "good old" may sound funny, but i'm missing these days...

Have fun analysing&playing and also thanks for all the fun here,

Alex
Parent - - By turbojuice1122 (Gold) [us] Date 2010-05-04 22:10
I had analyzed Qh5 in a fair amount of detail (though not as much as Nxf7) and concluded that black not only has no problems, but actually has counter-chances.  With Qxf7, which was in my opinion definitely the correct choice for white, black must play very carefully.
Parent - By SchachProfi (****) [de] Date 2010-05-05 03:50
I guess i know what you have seen in your analysis, but have a look at my game vs. keoki from time to time, i'm still in good shape for a draw+: http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=16526
- - By SchachProfi (****) [de] Date 2010-05-04 15:17
Well i slowly understand now what makes the/your-chosen (counter-attack-)b5-h6-defense-system so good ;-)...

Board of Game 1:

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Nf6 4. Ng5 d5 5. exd5 Nxd5 6. d4 Nxd4 7. c3 b5 8. Bd3 h6 9. Nxf7 Kxf7 10. cxd4 *

r1bq1b1r/p1p2kp1/7p/1p1np3/3P4/3B4/PP3PPP/RNBQK2R b KQ - 0 10
Parent - By turbojuice1122 (Gold) [us] Date 2010-05-04 22:11
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Nf6 4. Ng5 d5 5. exd5 Nxd5 6. d4 Nxd4 7. c3 b5 8. Bd3 h6 9. Nxf7 Kxf7 10. cxd4 exd4.  There were some interesting possibilities with 10...Bb4, but in the end, I decided it was just too risky.
- - By SchachProfi (****) [de] Date 2010-05-05 03:55
Yes, i also think that this kind of semi-Pinkus Variation 10. ... Bb4+ would have been an adventure (which needed very careful analysis), the chosen 10. ... exd4 seems to be the best move available for black and is also pretty natural.

For my eleventh move i considered the queen-moves Qf3+ and Qh5+ and Nd2 also, but didn't find enough potential in them, so i decided for this pretty beautiful position (king-side full developed, queen-side absolutely not, all remaining pawns on their original place with all center pawns gone already):

Board of Game 1:

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Nf6 4. Ng5 d5 5. exd5 Nxd5 6. d4 Nxd4 7. c3 b5 8. Bd3 h6 9. Nxf7 Kxf7 10. cxd4 exd4 11. O-O *

r1bq1b1r/p1p2kp1/7p/1p1n4/3p4/3B4/PP3PPP/RNBQ1RK1 b - - 1 11
Parent - - By turbojuice1122 (Gold) [us] Date 2010-05-05 09:26
And now we have my next major decision, which basically meant some major computer analysis into the resulting endgames.  My guess is that 11...Nf6, 11...Bb7, 11...a6, 11...Be6, 11...c6, as well as some others probably lead to a draw with perfect play, but things get dangerous with all of those within the next 5-10 moves, so I played the move that seems most stable, though perhaps unusual for the position:

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Nf6 4. Ng5 d5 5. exd5 Nxd5 6. d4 Nxd4 7. c3 b5 8. Bd3 h6 9. Nxf7 Kxf7 10. cxd4 exd4 11. O-O Rb8!?
Parent - - By SchachProfi (****) [de] Date 2010-05-05 21:00
Yes, that's a very stable move i feared you would play... this gives me a lot of headaches and homework now, can just start because the day was very busy (EUR/USD broken 1.30 yesterday with a big fight through the night, now on its way to my projected 1.25).

I guess i also survived the e4-trap in the Qh4-variation game vs. keoki... i guess this was one of the counter-attacks you were talking about yesterday. http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforum/topic_show.pl?tid=16526

btw., what are your main interests in astronomy, what star(-system) is your favorit one? ;-) Alex
Parent - By turbojuice1122 (Gold) [us] Date 2010-05-05 21:06
Yes, the ...e4 move is what equalizes for black in that variation according to my analysis.  I haven't looked at it in awhile, though, since after finding that, I focused all of my attention on 9.Nxf7.
Parent - - By turbojuice1122 (Gold) [us] Date 2010-05-05 21:33
By the way, regarding astronomy, my main interests are black holes and cosmology.  As for stars/systems, I don't really have a favorite one.  Perhaps Sun. :-)  Of other stars, perhaps Betelgeuse.
Parent - - By SchachProfi (****) [de] Date 2010-05-07 02:54
Yes, Betelgeuse is a real beauty in the mid of the (winter-)stars-hexagon (which can be seen in winter here in Germany, i guess its spring/autumn in US?!).
This picture of Canopus is just beautiful: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/17/Canopus.jpg
Btw., i now there is a theory that super-sized stars like Betelgeuse or Antares change their size by a factor of 2:1... i don't believe in this theory, i guess there is just a factor which filters the light in periodically timesframes... but just my 0.02$.
Parent - By turbojuice1122 (Gold) [us] Date 2010-05-07 04:45
We see the same constellations in the United States as you see in Germany at the same time of year--it's just that we see them about six hours later due to the time zone difference. :-)

Regarding the size change, if you consider the density of the outer layers of such stars, changing the radius by a factor of 2 really isn't all that big of a deal.  The "size" that we see is basically down to one "optical depth", which is roughly the surface of last scattering of photons from associated particles.  However, in a star that, if in our solar system at Sun's location, would consume the first four planets, if you're looking at the "edge" from the "side view" (which is always the case, by definition of "edge"), you're actually looking down a very substantial length of space, even though the region itself is not dense at all.  Thus, a slight change in the structure of the star (which tends to occur easily in supergiants) will cause a very large change in the "radius".  These changes have actually been observed in Betelgeuse by the Hubble Space Telescope, so it's known that they do happen.
- - By SchachProfi (****) [de] Date 2010-05-07 02:55
Hopefully the little Wallstreet-crash&back today inspired me :-)... there were a few interesting moves available, but here is my decision:

Board of Game 1:

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Nf6 4. Ng5 d5 5. exd5 Nxd5 6. d4 Nxd4 7. c3 b5 8. Bd3 h6
9. Nxf7 Kxf7 10. cxd4 cxd4 11. O-O Rb8 12. Nd2 *

1rbq1b1r/p1p2kp1/7p/1p1n4/3p4/3B4/PP1N1PPP/R1BQ1RK1 b - - 3 12
Parent - By turbojuice1122 (Gold) [us] Date 2010-05-07 04:47
Time to develop:

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Nf6 4. Ng5 d5 5. exd5 Nxd5 6. d4 Nxd4 7. c3 b5 8. Bd3 h6
9. Nxf7 Kxf7 10. cxd4 cxd4 11. O-O Rb8 12. Nd2 Bd6

12...Nb4 was my other option worth considering, but I feel like my king ends up being more safe in the variations resulting from the move that I have played.  I haven't investigated 12...Nb4 in detail--it just "feels" wrong in the resulting positions.
- - By SchachProfi (****) [de] Date 2010-05-08 03:59 Edited 2010-05-09 04:01
Will comment later :-)...

Board of Game 1:

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Nf6 4. Ng5 d5 5. exd5 Nxd5 6. d4 Nxd4 7. c3 b5 8. Bd3 h6
9. Nxf7 Kxf7 10. cxd4 cxd4 11. O-O Rb8 12. Nd2 Bd6 13. Re1 *

1rbq3r/p1p2kp1/3b3p/1p1n4/3p4/3B4/PP1N1PPP/R1BQR1K1 b - - 5 13
Parent - - By turbojuice1122 (Gold) [us] Date 2010-05-08 15:09
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Nf6 4. Ng5 d5 5. exd5 Nxd5 6. d4 Nxd4 7. c3 b5 8. Bd3 h6
9. Nxf7 Kxf7 10. cxd4 cxd4 11. O-O Rb8 12. Nd2 Bd6 13. Re1 Nf4

1rbq1b1r/p1p2kp1/7p/1p6/3p1n2/3B4/PP1N1PPP/R1BQR1K1 w - - 3 14


The engines somewhat like 13...Rb6 and 13...g5, but those later lead to major weaknesses on black's kingside that can be exploited, so I see my move as black's only move worth major consideration.
Parent - - By SchachProfi (****) [de] Date 2010-05-08 18:12
Hi Jason,

i was in a little hurry yesterday (my female roommate "forced" me to move *g*, even forgot to include the board-representation :-)), but i owe you my comments regarding my last moves: Well, i guess i blundered already with 12. Nd2 and/or 13. Re1, engines liked 12./13. a4 in both cases more but i don't wanted to play a just-engines-match here and include own ideas besides not liking the counter-attacks possible to black (which white survives, but damage the king-position). Your played 13. ... Nf4 is already a complete refutation to my last two moves... now i have to fight for a draw being one pawn down with nearly no compensation, and even that will be difficult against your perfect play till now (congrats for that!).

Will move later and have the Chessultant-cluster available next week for the first time (hopefully it finds my mistakes and can correct some),

Best wishes,

Alex
Parent - By turbojuice1122 (Gold) [us] Date 2010-05-08 18:47
Since you mentioned 12.a4, I'll say this: I had this extensively analyzed, and even though the engines might have preferred the move, I am very confident that it leads to a drawn endgame.  (More precisely, I analyzed many endgames with this, and there doesn't seem to be much of a way for white to break through--I was actually hoping that you would play this "recommended" move because then I could go on autopilot for the rest of the game.)
- - By SchachProfi (****) [de] Date 2010-05-09 03:59
I'm again late, will comment more tomorrow... hopefully (planet) Venus has shown me the right way today...
Also possible were Bf1 (pretty conservative), Nf3, Be4 and Qf3?.

Board of Game 1:

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Nf6 4. Ng5 d5 5. exd5 Nxd5 6. d4 Nxd4 7. c3 b5 8. Bd3 h6
9. Nxf7 Kxf7 10. cxd4 cxd4 11. O-O Rb8 12. Nd2 Bd6 13. Re1 Nf4 14. g3 *

1rbq3r/p1p2kp1/3b3p/1p6/3p1n2/3B2P1/PP1N1P1P/R1BQR1K1 b - - 0 14
Up Topic Correspondence Chess / Correspondence Chess / turbojuice1122 vs. SchachProfi challenge: Fried Liver-Attack
1 2 3 4 Previous Next  

Powered by mwForum 2.27.4 © 1999-2012 Markus Wichitill