What's the new in Stockfish 1.6.3 JA , What diferences between Stockfish 1.6.3 JA and old version Stockfish 1.6.2 JA ??
Somebody know? And now....how aboute ELO ? how much is now?
1 Rybka 3 Dyn,Rybka 3.ctg 3201 28 27 565 79% 2971 27%
2 Rybka 3,Rybka3.ctg 3188 28 27 557 79% 2965 30%
3 Rybka 3 C0,Rybka 3.ctg 3172 28 27 438 73% 3022 41%
4 Stockfish 1.6.2,Salvo 1.6.bin 3161 25 24 538 66% 3056 43%
and new verision ? maybe Sedat know?
"In task manager Stockfish 1.6 is not at 100% while 1.6.3 is" I check this earlier and I must confirm that,
I agreee with YOU, so can You give link for yours game at this engine
Authors comments on Jim's page:
The aim of this release is to fix all the reported bugs that have accumulated.
It is 100% functionally and speed equivalent to 1.6.2 so there is NO ELO DIFFERENCE.
To be honest I was a bit disappointed to see there was no difference myself.
I am really looking forward to next versions of this and Komodo.
PS And of course Rybka 4, but I figure that could be a while ;)
Also uploaded here
I recognize the overwhelming use of 64 bit- but just for those of us who are still lingering and waiting to upgrade to 64 bit here is also a link for Dan's Stockfish 1.6.3.s with a 32bit engine included.
> I recognize the overwhelming use of 64 bit- but just for those of us who are still lingering and waiting to upgrade to 64 bit here is also a link for Dan's Stockfish 1.6.3.s with a 32bit engine included.
I wasn't aware the 32-bit StockFish 1.6.3s counterpart was compiled. I appreciate this and will keep this 32-bit SF-SS for keeps-sake :) I have 64-bit OS Quad PC though.
> There should be some increase in strength.There is a small reported increase due to these bug fixes.
Well, according to the SF Team, the releases from 1.6 to 1.6.3 have all been maintenance release - with the exception of Dann Corbit's SF version of course. Still, most people have reported an ELO increase in spite of SF 1.6+ being maintenance. Maybe there's ELO gains, maybe not. I haven't tested all SF-1.6+ versions to verify these reports.
> but I am sure they are planning a "real" strength upgrade very soon. That should pull in some good ELO gains.
Same hopes here for SF. I can hardly wait for the next major SF release rather than the maintenance released versions. My main concern with SF is the evaluations that most seem unsatisfied with. I hope the SF Teams considers too - if possible.
Name Rating ELO + − Score Average Opponent Draws Games
Stockfish 1.6s JA 64-bit 4CPU 3187 +14 −14 68.1% −126.7 37.3% 1793
Stockfish 1.6.2 64-bit 4CPU 3179 +14 −14 66.7% −118.3 36.0% 1795
> It has 8 more elo points, but also 8 elo weaker opposition overall.
That's not important. However, the +14 -14 really indicate that there's no proof of the SS version is stronger, but there's a 78.8% chance that it indeed is stronger.
Powered by mwForum 2.27.4 © 1999-2012 Markus Wichitill