Hi,
What's the new in Stockfish 1.6.3 JA , What diferences between Stockfish 1.6.3 JA and old version Stockfish 1.6.2 JA ??
Somebody know? And now....how aboute ELO ? how much is now?
1 Rybka 3 Dyn,Rybka 3.ctg 3201 28 27 565 79% 2971 27%
2 Rybka 3,Rybka3.ctg 3188 28 27 557 79% 2965 30%
3 Rybka 3 C0,Rybka 3.ctg 3172 28 27 438 73% 3022 41%
4 Stockfish 1.6.2,Salvo 1.6.bin 3161 25 24 538 66% 3056 43%
and new verision ? maybe Sedat know?
Sekos
What's the new in Stockfish 1.6.3 JA , What diferences between Stockfish 1.6.3 JA and old version Stockfish 1.6.2 JA ??
Somebody know? And now....how aboute ELO ? how much is now?
1 Rybka 3 Dyn,Rybka 3.ctg 3201 28 27 565 79% 2971 27%
2 Rybka 3,Rybka3.ctg 3188 28 27 557 79% 2965 30%
3 Rybka 3 C0,Rybka 3.ctg 3172 28 27 438 73% 3022 41%
4 Stockfish 1.6.2,Salvo 1.6.bin 3161 25 24 538 66% 3056 43%
and new verision ? maybe Sedat know?
Sekos
I tested on 8 cores and it was around +30 ELO. I don't think you will see much improvement except for 8 core systems, although I could be wrong. In task manager Stockfish 1.6 is not at 100% while 1.6.3 is, this would make it seem like the latest version has better MP scaling.
thnax M ANSARI
"In task manager Stockfish 1.6 is not at 100% while 1.6.3 is" I check this earlier and I must confirm that,
I agreee with YOU, so can You give link for yours game at this engine
Sekos
"In task manager Stockfish 1.6 is not at 100% while 1.6.3 is" I check this earlier and I must confirm that,
I agreee with YOU, so can You give link for yours game at this engine
Sekos
agree i have posted this,also on TalkChess.
The author said that this is a bugfix release only (1.63). The Elo difference should be zero when compared to 1.62. Any small Elo differences you see might be due to errors from using a small sample size.
Authors comments on Jim's page:
What's New:
Maintenance release.
The aim of this release is to fix all the reported bugs that have accumulated.
It is 100% functionally and speed equivalent to 1.6.2 so there is NO ELO DIFFERENCE.
http://homepages.tesco.net/henry.ablett/jims.html
Authors comments on Jim's page:
What's New:
Maintenance release.
The aim of this release is to fix all the reported bugs that have accumulated.
It is 100% functionally and speed equivalent to 1.6.2 so there is NO ELO DIFFERENCE.
http://homepages.tesco.net/henry.ablett/jims.html
Good POINT, thanx for Response Dave .
Sekos
Sekos
Your welcome mate.
To be honest I was a bit disappointed to see there was no difference myself.
I am really looking forward to next versions of this and Komodo.
Dave
PS And of course Rybka 4, but I figure that could be a while ;)
To be honest I was a bit disappointed to see there was no difference myself.
I am really looking forward to next versions of this and Komodo.
Dave
PS And of course Rybka 4, but I figure that could be a while ;)
With 8 cores, there is a difference in ELO. I am not sure how much this ELO gain is but probably around 20 to 30 ELO plus. The reason is quite simple, only the latest Stockfish release enables all 8 CPU's. In previous versions it only enables 7 CPU's. You can see that in Task manager. In my testing it was +28 ELO stronger, but my tests were 3_1 so that is pretty fast time control. Most likely at longer time controls it will be less and I would guess 1 extra usable CPU to worth about 15 ELO to 20 ELO. With 4 cores I think there should be very little difference if any.
Good for you Maj ANSARI :). By the way, just in case no one knew about the "other" StockFish 1.6.3s by Dann Corbit, here it is from the TalkChess threads http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=32316
Also uploaded here
Also uploaded here
Attachment: StockFish_1.6.3s_DannCorbit.zip (3506k)
Hi Prima,
I recognize the overwhelming use of 64 bit- but just for those of us who are still lingering and waiting to upgrade to 64 bit here is also a link for Dan's Stockfish 1.6.3.s with a 32bit engine included.
http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=328088&highlight=#328088
I recognize the overwhelming use of 64 bit- but just for those of us who are still lingering and waiting to upgrade to 64 bit here is also a link for Dan's Stockfish 1.6.3.s with a 32bit engine included.
http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=328088&highlight=#328088
> I recognize the overwhelming use of 64 bit- but just for those of us who are still lingering and waiting to upgrade to 64 bit here is also a link for Dan's Stockfish 1.6.3.s with a 32bit engine included.
Thanks sidserious.
I wasn't aware the 32-bit StockFish 1.6.3s counterpart was compiled. I appreciate this and will keep this 32-bit SF-SS for keeps-sake :) I have 64-bit OS Quad PC though.
15 to 20 Elo from a speedup of 7 to 8 cores alone, i.e. less than 15 percent, seems highly unlikely. The gain would have to be partially due to poor utilization of cores 5, 6, and 7 in 1.6.2.
There should be some increase in strength.There is a small reported increase due to these bug fixes.
> There should be some increase in strength.There is a small reported increase due to these bug fixes.
Well, according to the SF Team, the releases from 1.6 to 1.6.3 have all been maintenance release - with the exception of Dann Corbit's SF version of course. Still, most people have reported an ELO increase in spite of SF 1.6+ being maintenance. Maybe there's ELO gains, maybe not. I haven't tested all SF-1.6+ versions to verify these reports.
i view such engines, (esp. Stockfish 1.6.3s(dc)) from correspondence players look, and its amazing. it found nearly every difficult move after 10-30 min, where rybka needs half a day or more :)
Apparently the SF-Smooth Scaling implementation from Dann Corbit has some positive impacts. Hopefully smooth scaling will find its way into the main line SF sooner.
To be honest I still don't know how SS affects the engine. It seemed to test really well last time I tested it, but others have claimed that it is not much ELO gain. I think they are planning to implement it after they figure out which is the best setup. So far the last few SF upgrades have been minor cosmetic and bug fix upgrades, but I am sure they are planning a "real" strength upgrade very soon. That should pull in some good ELO gains.
> but I am sure they are planning a "real" strength upgrade very soon. That should pull in some good ELO gains.
Same hopes here for SF. I can hardly wait for the next major SF release rather than the maintenance released versions. My main concern with SF is the evaluations that most seem unsatisfied with. I hope the SF Teams considers too - if possible.
As you said from Corrrespondence point of View how do you use it ?. In IDeA or Infinite Analysis ?
Infinite Analysis and i move forward myself, and was analysing known positions, where rybka computed 3 weeks :) and found better moves after 2 weeks
From CCRL 40/4 list. I don't see how the SS version is any stronger. It has 8 more elo points, but also 8 elo weaker opposition overall.
Name Rating ELO + − Score Average Opponent Draws Games
Stockfish 1.6s JA 64-bit 4CPU 3187 +14 −14 68.1% −126.7 37.3% 1793
Stockfish 1.6.2 64-bit 4CPU 3179 +14 −14 66.7% −118.3 36.0% 1795
Name Rating ELO + − Score Average Opponent Draws Games
Stockfish 1.6s JA 64-bit 4CPU 3187 +14 −14 68.1% −126.7 37.3% 1793
Stockfish 1.6.2 64-bit 4CPU 3179 +14 −14 66.7% −118.3 36.0% 1795
> It has 8 more elo points, but also 8 elo weaker opposition overall.
That's not important. However, the +14 -14 really indicate that there's no proof of the SS version is stronger, but there's a 78.8% chance that it indeed is stronger.
Powered by mwForum 2.27.4 © 1999-2012 Markus Wichitill