> when posts are being made after several warnings what can you do?
In the sidserious case, he was posting deliberately new threads in wrong sections over and over, and he created new threads about the same subject on the wrong section immediately after they were moved to the Flip Side. We kept asking him to stop until he finally did, but no content (even, duplicate content) was deleted.
So I disagree on deleting content posted on the wrong place, when it can be moved to the right place.
Thanks very much for the PM :)
and i hope you're not implying i posted pictures of "real people suffering"....
things have blown over a little in there, but what ticks me off is that the moderation isn't fair. i have no problem with rules and such, but apply them fairly. i know for a fact, if anything, guests to the rybka forum are given a little more freedom than usual. that's respect.
1.e4 c5.2.d4 cxd4.3.c3 dxc3.4.Nxc3 Nc6.5.Nf3 e6.6.Bc4 a6.7.0-0 b5.8.Bd3 Bb7.9.Bf4 Rc8.10.Qe2
10...Bc5 in 30 mins
hamsters have played 11.Rac1
position after 11...Nce7
Analysis by Rybka 2.3.2a mp 32-bit :
= (0.24) 1.e5 Ng6 00:00:00
= (0.19) 1.e5 Ng6 2.Bg3 00:00:00
= (0.19) 1.Bd2 Nh6 2.e5 00:00:00
= (-0.06) 1.Bd2 Ng6 2.b4 Bd6 00:00:00
= (0.19) 1.e5 Ng6 2.Bg3 N8e7 00:00:00
= (0.20) 1.Bg5 Nh6 2.Qd2 0-0 00:00:00
= (0.12) 1.Bg5 Nh6 2.Qd2 0-0 3.Bxh6 00:00:01
= (0.24) 1.e5 Ng6 2.Bg3 N8e7 3.Ne4 00:00:01
= (0.25) 1.e5 Ng6 2.Bg3 N8e7 3.Ne4 Bxe4 00:00:01
= (0.11) 1.e5 Ng6 2.Bg3 f5 3.a4 b4 4.Nd1 00:00:01
= (0.00) 1.e5 Ng6 2.Bg3 f5 3.a4 b4 4.Nd1 N8e7 00:00:03
= (0.12) 1.Bg5 Nh6 2.Qd2 Qb6 3.a3 f6 4.Bxh6 gxh6 5.Qxh6 Ng6 00:00:05
= (0.00) 1.Bg5 Qb6 2.e5 f6 3.Bd2 fxe5 4.Nxe5 Nf6 5.Bg5 Rf8 00:00:11
= (-0.04) 1.Bg5 Qb6 2.a3 Nc6 3.b4 Nd4 4.Qd1 Nxf3+ 5.Qxf3 Bd4 6.Ne2 Rxc1 00:00:31
= (0.05) 1.Bg5 Qb6 2.a3 Nc6 3.b4 Nd4 4.Qd1 Nxf3+ 5.Qxf3 Bd4 6.Ne2 Rxc1 7.Rxc1 Nf6 00:01:07
= (0.05) 1.Bg5 Qb6 2.a3 Nc6 3.b4 Nd4 4.Qd1 Nxf3+ 5.Qxf3 Bd4 6.Ne2 Rxc1 7.Rxc1 Nf6 00:01:37
= (0.00) 1.Bg5 Qb6 2.a3 Nc6 3.b4 Nd4 4.Qd1 Nxf3+ 5.Qxf3 Bd6 6.Ne2 Rxc1 7.Rxc1 Ne7 00:02:22
= (0.07) 1.Bd2 Ng6 2.b4 Bd6 3.g3 Nf6 4.a4 Bxb4 5.Nxb5 Rxc1 6.Rxc1 axb5 7.Bxb4 bxa4 00:03:08
= (0.00) 1.Bd2 d6 2.b4 Bxb4 3.Bxb5+ axb5 4.Qxb5+ Nc6 5.Qxb7 Nge7 6.Rfd1 0-0 7.Qb5 h6 00:05:19
= (0.00) 1.Bd2 d6 2.b4 Bxb4 3.Bxb5+ axb5 4.Qxb5+ Nc6 5.Qxb7 Nge7 6.Rfd1 0-0 7.a4 h6 00:08:26
= (0.02) 1.Bd2 d6 2.b4 Bxb4 3.Bxb5+ axb5 4.Qxb5+ Nc6 5.Qxb7 Nge7 6.Rfd1 0-0 7.a4 Bc5 00:14:29
Of course, keep in mind that they are not playing against Rybka--they are playing against the Rybka Warriors. :-)
>Of course, keep in mind that they are not playing against Rybka--they are playing against the Rybka Warriors.
we must not show them rybka analysis.. they may find a good defense or something...
(up to now i was sure that the hamsters were putting all their faith on Hiarcs12... i hope this doesn't spoil it all) :-D
Do the rules of this match in fact forbid each side to look at the analysis of the opposing engine, or is this a freestyle "anything goes" type of match?
Crash Test Dummy
I have probably forgotten some but these are what spring to mind.
I see then that the team has changed very considerably from when you were playing against me and in the previous games--unless you're confusing number of posts with amount of analysis. :-)
the old Dedicated Chess Computers are well represented on the Mighty Hiarcs team
The Novag Super Expert B6 has joined the team and is currently pondering away happily:
Eval +1.07 Regards
> We are using Rybka of course but you would lose your bet as I am sure Graham could confirm.
Yes, I can confirm that Turbo would have lost such a bet.
>It's freestyle. I would bet a moderately large amount of money that the vast majority of their computer-based analysis comes from Rybka
If it's freestyle, I have to believe that The Rybka Warriors are taking advantage of their inside contacts to use Rybka 3 (or what passes for Rybka 3 at the moment). This cannot be a good thing for white.
Powered by mwForum 2.27.4 © 1999-2012 Markus Wichitill