told you we loved you letting you post this,keep it up.
Where did you find Aquarium's new logo? :)
you dont have to ask,harveys helping you develop it
> Where did you find Aquarium's new logo?
No, no, I'm pretty sure that we agreed the toilet should be pink :)
GUI feminine as well,really got to get my brain working on this now.ie name for GUI,the mind boggles
harvey, you havent updated our site after your suprising third move,we are all in a state of shock.
Moves so far: 1.e4 c5 2.d4 cxd4 3.c3 dxc3
The HIARCS Headbangers have chosen the combative Morra Gambit and the Rybka Warriors have taken up the challenge. It appears both teams are playing for the win, should be interesting!
The HIARCS Headbangers have chosen the combative Morra Gambit and the Rybka Warriors have taken up the challenge. It appears both teams are playing for the win, should be interesting!
4. Nxc3 Nc6
The main line.
The main line.
Hi,
it means it will be draw ;-).
Rgds
Hetman
it means it will be draw ;-).
Rgds
Hetman
The game is as follows:
1.e4 c5 2.d4 cxd4 3.c3!? dxc3 4.Nxc3 Nc6 5.Nf3
1.e4 c5 2.d4 cxd4 3.c3!? dxc3 4.Nxc3 Nc6 5.Nf3
r1bqkbnr/pp1ppppp/2n5/8/4P3/2N2N2/PP3PPP/R1BQKB1R b KQkq - 0 5
5... e6 6. Bc4 and the Rybka Warriors managed to leak its/her thread (at least temporarily). :)
For which we thank them :)
you're welcome. you gave us a pawn for free. so we decided to give you a peek into our minds.
your welcome to the pawn odds - I don't think I want to see into your minds.
i can see it wasn't your idea. after all, no one understands this opening better than you.. so you must have known it was going to be an uphill battle...
As with the minds of Sauron and Morgoth, you only see what they're willing for you to see...
1.e4 c5 2.d4 cxd4 3.c3 dxc3 4.Nxc3 Nc6 5.Nf3 e6 6.Bc4
r1bqkbnr/pp1p1ppp/2n1p3/8/2B1P3/2N2N2/PP3PPP/R1BQK2R w KQkq - 0 6
if thry follow all known book it is an easy win for us.what do you suggest in game 2 for our opening move.present game is over in real life
1.b3
we have an expert... sorry, the expert
we have an expert... sorry, the expert
christ that was a quick reply
my browser must have refreshed a millisecond after you posted :-D
didn't mean to spook you :-p
well, the first game is so over, that i'm finding time to post in the normal threads again :)
didn't mean to spook you :-p
well, the first game is so over, that i'm finding time to post in the normal threads again :)
nearly as bad as you biting your fingernails off last night
Have you guys gotten done analyzing the ...Qxf1+ line? That's the only one that we haven't worked out to either checkmate or a tablebase win yet...
wrong thread, get dadi...
well alans the boy for this and we have history on it
1.e4 c5 2.d4 cxd4 3.c3 dxc3 4.Nxc3 Nc6 5.Nf3 e6 6.Bc4 a6
r1bqkbnr/1p1p1ppp/p1n1p3/8/2B1P3/2N2N2/PP3PPP/R1BQK2R w KQkq - 0 7
Just so people have some insight into the progress of our analysis...we are already voting on the first move in the second game of the match. :-)
because of game 1, now i'm even confident in the Sokolsky for game 2...
Current moves: 1.e4 c5 2.d4 cxd4 3.c3 dxc3 4.Nxc3 Nc6 5.Nf3 e6 6.Bc4 a6 7.0-0 b5
r1bqkbnr/3p1ppp/p1n1p3/1p6/2B1P3/2N2N2/PP3PPP/R1BQ1RK1 w kq b6 0 8
Current moves and position:
1.e4 c5 2.d4 cxd4 3.c3 dxc3 4.Nxc3 Nc6 5.Nf3 e6 6.Bc4 a6 7.0-0 b5 8.Bd3 Bb7
1.e4 c5 2.d4 cxd4 3.c3 dxc3 4.Nxc3 Nc6 5.Nf3 e6 6.Bc4 a6 7.0-0 b5 8.Bd3 Bb7
r2qkbnr/1b1p1ppp/p1n1p3/1p6/4P3/2NB1N2/PP3PPP/R1BQ1RK1 w kq - 0 9
We have actually recently obtained some exclusive video of the Hiarcs Hamsters practicing for the current match:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=76HcLEunsws
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1_kgNp9oQg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=76HcLEunsws
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1_kgNp9oQg
the moves of the the game so far against Hamster Forum are
1.e4 c5.2.d4 cxd4.3.c3 dxc3.4.Nxc3 Nc6.5.Nf3 e6.6.Bc4 a6.7.0-0 b5.8.Bd3 Bb7.9.Bf4 Rc8.
1.e4 c5.2.d4 cxd4.3.c3 dxc3.4.Nxc3 Nc6.5.Nf3 e6.6.Bc4 a6.7.0-0 b5.8.Bd3 Bb7.9.Bf4 Rc8.
holy crap does Hiarcs moderation suck. i've never seen a forum run like a dictatorship and it's been very long since i've been reduced to this.. one thing is sure, after this is done, i'm not going to make a habit out of posting there. (no wonder that although i've joined that forum only recently, i'm already in the top 30 in the most active users EVER...).
Rybka forum moderators.. you spoil us.. lol..
Rybka forum moderators.. you spoil us.. lol..
> i'm not going to make a habit out of posting there.
I think a forum should not be judged by its moderators, but by its user base.
I'm glad you're not complaining about Rybka Moderation ;)
We removed pictures of disabled and disfigured people that had been posted as so called trash about the Hiarcs forum v Rybka forum match, We also deleted some crap about the match that was posted in a thread about the release of Mac Hiarcs 12.1. We would not trash the threads that Vas and Larry are runnig about Rybka 3 - and certainly not with pictures of real people suffering. Of course we may post the odd recipe sometimes but are always careful where we post such culinary delights.
This was posted by your current team Captain:
[quote="NATIONAL12"]thanks harvey,we are on the same side on this one.[/quote]
This was posted by your current team Captain:
[quote="NATIONAL12"]thanks harvey,we are on the same side on this one.[/quote]
> We also deleted some crap about the match that was posted in a thread about the release of Mac Hiarcs 12.1.
Does your forum software have the ability to branch content and then merge it with another thread? That's what we do around here (instead of deleting the content.)
yes we have moved several posts but when posts are being made after several warnings what can you do? I am sure if I had copied some of those pictures here you would have deleted them also. Making fun of disabled/disfigured people is not my idea of humour. Most of the posts are funny but a couple of your members seem more interested in posting this rubbish rather than just playing a friendly game of Chess.
Nobody was making fun of disabled/disfigured people--you really are exaggerating quite nicely to try to make the Rybka people look bad; I guess it's the next best thing when white's position is deteriorating...
The picture posted was posted by tomski after your captain at the time posted a picture of marijuana girls, calling them tomski, myself, and Paul. I personally thought this was okay. tomski's response was a "picture" of your captain "after the party" as a very ugly old woman smoking a cigarette, with the implication that this is what cigarettes do to people. She was simply a very ugly old woman. First, the picture wasn't making fun of the woman in the picture--it was making fun of your captain. As a response to his post, that was fine. What was NOT fine was Steve then saying that the woman was actually tomski's girlfriend. I complained about this, and Steve acted as though the line was the ugliness of the picture, and now this seems to have evolved into making fun of people with disabilities. When I complained about this and then asked exactly where his line was, my posts were deleted.
The picture posted was posted by tomski after your captain at the time posted a picture of marijuana girls, calling them tomski, myself, and Paul. I personally thought this was okay. tomski's response was a "picture" of your captain "after the party" as a very ugly old woman smoking a cigarette, with the implication that this is what cigarettes do to people. She was simply a very ugly old woman. First, the picture wasn't making fun of the woman in the picture--it was making fun of your captain. As a response to his post, that was fine. What was NOT fine was Steve then saying that the woman was actually tomski's girlfriend. I complained about this, and Steve acted as though the line was the ugliness of the picture, and now this seems to have evolved into making fun of people with disabilities. When I complained about this and then asked exactly where his line was, my posts were deleted.
Being ugly isn't really a disability, is it?
Well, I suppose that it is a diability in that it prevents people from being able to have certain careers in showbusiness...
> What was NOT fine was Steve then saying that the woman was actually tomski's girlfriend.
So... (light-hearted) personal attacks are okay as long as they only attack the person and nobody else?? Or what do you mean?
They're okay as long as they attack people who willingly put themselves in line for the attack. Tomski's wife is not involved in this game; if the post said that it was a picture of myself, I probably would have chuckled about some sort of projective vision on the Hiarcs side--but if it was said to be a picture of my girlfriend, I would have been extremely angry.
lol
the rubbish started on your side when things got a little 'personal'.. we kept things very objective
what KNs are you getting on your Quad with Zappa.i am getting 6254 at the moment on AN of move 30. at D25
i don't have zappa, but my R232a is getting 650 now with an OC'd chip
get Zappa,it will be the best money you have ever spent
Powered by mwForum 2.27.4 © 1999-2012 Markus Wichitill
