Hi all,
Inspired by TCEC season 10, stage 1, I have made a new testset: Noomen 2-move Testsuite.
200 lines with only 2 book moves (4 ply), for engine-engine testing. See the attachment below.
Enjoy testing!
Jeroen
Inspired by TCEC season 10, stage 1, I have made a new testset: Noomen 2-move Testsuite.
200 lines with only 2 book moves (4 ply), for engine-engine testing. See the attachment below.
Enjoy testing!
Jeroen
Attachment: Noomen2-moveTestsuite.pgn (42k)
Thanks for your efforts, as always.
Thanks, Dann. Always a pleasure to release something that can be useful to other people in the computer chess community.
Epd version (with interior nodes analyzed as well) attached
Attachment: jn-2move.7z - Analyzed Epd for Jeroen's 2 move book (including interior book nodes) (33k)
Also added Noomen 3-move Testsuite: 500 lines with only 3 book moves.
Download link:
http://blogchess2016.blogspot.nl/2017/10/noomen-2-move-testsuite.html
Download link:
http://blogchess2016.blogspot.nl/2017/10/noomen-2-move-testsuite.html
The Noomen 2-move Testsuite and Noomen 3-move Testsuite are now also available as 3-move.ctg ChessBase book:
http://blogchess2016.blogspot.nl/2017/12/noomen-3-move-ctg-book.html
http://blogchess2016.blogspot.nl/2017/12/noomen-3-move-ctg-book.html
I get a google warning on that download.
google were trying to make a user-profile of me and giving it
to advertisers and whether I wanted to block that.
[I never had that before, afair)
--------------------------------
what were the criteria to select these openings ?
--------------------------------------
thanks also to user923005 for the extensive commentation and analysis, 325 lines = fens = openings,
of which
10-17 entries per line, separated by ";" ... (trying to figure this out)
google were trying to make a user-profile of me and giving it
to advertisers and whether I wanted to block that.
[I never had that before, afair)
--------------------------------
what were the criteria to select these openings ?
--------------------------------------
thanks also to user923005 for the extensive commentation and analysis, 325 lines = fens = openings,
of which
10-17 entries per line, separated by ";" ... (trying to figure this out)
Most of the EPD simply follows the EPD part of the PGN standard:
https://opensource.apple.com/source/Chess/Chess-109.0.3/Documentation/PGN-Standard.txt
(See section 16.2).
However, I add my own fields:
cce is computed centipawn evaluation which is based on wins/losses and draws. I did a parabolic least squares fit to approximate the computer scores.
white_wins black_wins and draws are the number of games with particular outcomes in my filtered game database (not all games have outcomes, some are *)
I use pm in a non-standard way. The PGN Standard says that the pm is just the first node of the pv, but I consider that both redundant and useless. I use pv as the collection of the most likely moves to be played. If there is a number in curly brackets after the suggested move, that number is how often the move was actually played.
So, given this:
Postition, side to move, castle rights and ep status:
Other fields are described here:
acd 36; means the depth of the analysis was 36 plies
acs 148; means that the position was analyzed for 148 seconds
bm g6; means that g6 appears to be better than other moves.
c3 "Nf6" means that I was studying Nf6 at some point or the position appeared in a famous game and Nf6 was played. I use that comment field to hold suggested moves for study.
cce -26; means that in actual game outcomes, black is behind by about 1/4 pawn
ce 0 means the computer says the position is even
id "es-dc-neutral.0524"; means it is contained in the test set es-dc-neutral (a collection of severely balanced openings)
pm Nc6 {9274} Nf6 {4553} g6 {3298} b6 {654} e6 {588} e5 {400} d6 {35} d5 {4} a6 {3} Na6 {2} f5 {2} b5 {1} h6 {1}; means that Nc6 is the most likely move, followed by Nf6, and g6
pv g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 Nc6 e3 e6 Nge2 Nge7 O-O O-O d4 cxd4 exd4 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Re1 Qb6 Na4 Qd8 Nac3; is the computer plan for this position
white_wins 6593; black_wins 5528; draws 6011 are simply the game outcomes from my database for this position
Opening English Opening: Symmetrical Variation. Normal Variation 1.c4 c5 2.Nc3; CaxtonID: 523; ECO: A34; is the name and description of the opening
https://opensource.apple.com/source/Chess/Chess-109.0.3/Documentation/PGN-Standard.txt
(See section 16.2).
However, I add my own fields:
cce is computed centipawn evaluation which is based on wins/losses and draws. I did a parabolic least squares fit to approximate the computer scores.
white_wins black_wins and draws are the number of games with particular outcomes in my filtered game database (not all games have outcomes, some are *)
I use pm in a non-standard way. The PGN Standard says that the pm is just the first node of the pv, but I consider that both redundant and useless. I use pv as the collection of the most likely moves to be played. If there is a number in curly brackets after the suggested move, that number is how often the move was actually played.
So, given this:
rnbqkbnr/pp1ppppp/8/2p5/2P5/2N5/PP1PPPPP/R1BQKBNR b KQkq - acd 36; acs 148; bm g6; c3 "Nf6"; cce -26; ce 0; id "es-dc-neutral.0524";
pm Nc6 {9274} Nf6 {4553} g6 {3298} b6 {654} e6 {588} e5 {400} d6 {35} d5 {4} a6 {3} Na6 {2} f5 {2} b5 {1} h6 {1}; pv g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 Nc6 e3 e6 Nge2 Nge7 O-O O-O d4 cxd4 exd4 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Re1 Qb6 Na4 Qd8 Nac3; white_wins 6593; black_wins 5528; draws 6011; Opening English Opening: Symmetrical Variation. Normal Variation 1.c4 c5 2.Nc3; CaxtonID: 523; ECO: A34; Postition, side to move, castle rights and ep status:
rnbqkbnr/pp1ppppp/8/2p5/2P5/2N5/PP1PPPPP/R1BQKBNR b KQkq -
Other fields are described here:
acd 36; means the depth of the analysis was 36 plies
acs 148; means that the position was analyzed for 148 seconds
bm g6; means that g6 appears to be better than other moves.
c3 "Nf6" means that I was studying Nf6 at some point or the position appeared in a famous game and Nf6 was played. I use that comment field to hold suggested moves for study.
cce -26; means that in actual game outcomes, black is behind by about 1/4 pawn
ce 0 means the computer says the position is even
id "es-dc-neutral.0524"; means it is contained in the test set es-dc-neutral (a collection of severely balanced openings)
pm Nc6 {9274} Nf6 {4553} g6 {3298} b6 {654} e6 {588} e5 {400} d6 {35} d5 {4} a6 {3} Na6 {2} f5 {2} b5 {1} h6 {1}; means that Nc6 is the most likely move, followed by Nf6, and g6
pv g6 g3 Bg7 Bg2 Nc6 e3 e6 Nge2 Nge7 O-O O-O d4 cxd4 exd4 d5 cxd5 Nxd5 Re1 Qb6 Na4 Qd8 Nac3; is the computer plan for this position
white_wins 6593; black_wins 5528; draws 6011 are simply the game outcomes from my database for this position
Opening English Opening: Symmetrical Variation. Normal Variation 1.c4 c5 2.Nc3; CaxtonID: 523; ECO: A34; is the name and description of the opening
is it somehow automated , can others use it ?
with reference, using their database
with reference, using their database
I have computerized processes running analysis on several machines.
Anyone is welcome to use it.
It is just information.
Nobody owns truth
Anyone is welcome to use it.
It is just information.
Nobody owns truth
Powered by mwForum 2.27.4 © 1999-2012 Markus Wichitill