When I play OTB, I can hold my own against players my own age or older but usually get crushed by kids (as young as 10 of either sex). By all accounts they spend most of their time playing against Fritz and including its moves in their repatoires They never play normal openings (ie the ones I know). Does any one know of an anti-Fritz opening book? It might come in handy for me (Aquarium or ctg format). Cheers!
my friend,instead of looking about an 'anti-Fritz' opening book,i think you must start studying tactics...
from what are you telling,you losse because the kids are better than you playing chess,so even if you memorize the entire book,what you will do when you will be out of book?
so if you want an advice,study tactics instead of memorizing openings
from what are you telling,you losse because the kids are better than you playing chess,so even if you memorize the entire book,what you will do when you will be out of book?
so if you want an advice,study tactics instead of memorizing openings
Hi irulats,
is there any chance you could provide the PGN of a few of your recent games? I'd like to take a look at them.
I agree with Barnard that an "anti-Fritz" book will just be a waste of your study time.
is there any chance you could provide the PGN of a few of your recent games? I'd like to take a look at them.
I agree with Barnard that an "anti-Fritz" book will just be a waste of your study time.
he told he losse against 'kids' aged 10 years,of boths sexes...so or all of those kids are genius memorizing openings and all of them have photographic memory,or simply,the kids play unusual moves (simply wrong opening moves),and they win their games because they are stronger than him
so i think is more plausible that they are stronger than him,than all of them are genius with photographic memory
study tactics,and when he improve tactics,study strategy...im sure he will improve his chess too much than studying openings;memorizing a complet book is a waste of time if you havent an according high play strenght
so i think is more plausible that they are stronger than him,than all of them are genius with photographic memory
study tactics,and when he improve tactics,study strategy...im sure he will improve his chess too much than studying openings;memorizing a complet book is a waste of time if you havent an according high play strenght
What's with the new name? Playing cat and mouse with someone!!!! 


He seems to take our discussions much more seriously than I do, I'd never have changed my name to Jerry just to win a discussion.
my friend,i do all needed things to win a discussion
yes,something like that
> Hi irulats,
>
> is there any chance you could provide the PGN of a few of your recent games? I'd like to take a look at them.
>
> I agree with Barnard that an "anti-Fritz" book will just be a waste of your study time.
Hi, Homayoun_Sohrabi_MD, sorry for the delay in replying to you. I had 2 big interviews recently as well as a pile of work. I'm now shattered. Believe it or not, I never got round to typing up my last games yet. I'll give it a go over the next few days and will post them here.
Ok. Look forward to them
I can Make your opening preparation. Just let me know what u want to play.
Om my friend,read between lines...
I Have. I know what I am saying.
Ok my friend
I have twice lost to these kids who memorize the whole NCO and BCO without knowing what is for what. U make slight error and they find cheap tactics.
So I have prepared some gambits which will put them in dillemma and the positional understanding matters. I have played Evans gambit and Kings Muzio Gambit with success.
As theier coach asks to memorize the main lines of popular openings they fell off the chair When I sac something.
So I have prepared some gambits which will put them in dillemma and the positional understanding matters. I have played Evans gambit and Kings Muzio Gambit with success.
As theier coach asks to memorize the main lines of popular openings they fell off the chair When I sac something.
Om,even if they can memorize the whole opening encyclopaedia,better than Kasparov,if they dont play a good chess (i mean play at lets say,at 2000 elo level),they wont we able to beat you...if they can memorize the whole encyclopaedia,but they are patzers,they must losse
Remember Well begun is half done.
In otb psychology plays a part. If one plays from memeory and another thinking every move , sooner or later they will be in time trouble. That
is a deciding factor most of the time IN OTB.
In otb psychology plays a part. If one plays from memeory and another thinking every move , sooner or later they will be in time trouble. That
is a deciding factor most of the time IN OTB.
well,i can assure you that if you opponent is a patzer,you can start playing b3,next move g3,and out of theory
of course,if is a patzer...i recall about it since he stated he losses against kids aged 10 years...one of them can be a genius,but all the others for sure are are patzers
of course,if is a patzer...i recall about it since he stated he losses against kids aged 10 years...one of them can be a genius,but all the others for sure are are patzers
Who said that!!. Thats a main line opening.
out of theory for the kids,not out of thery in general Om,as im sure the kids wont study that
I am something specific. Its the Approach.
For example see this game of my student IM Anwesh Upadhya in Dubai Open against GM A Fedorov.
My student played Petroff Defence as he never lost that opening against playing strong players including many GMs.
He was happy with da draw. But look how Fedorov beat him without doing anything but took 25-30 mins at move 4!!!!!
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. d4 Nxe4 4. dxe5 d5 5. Nbd2 Nc6 6. Nxe4 dxe4 7. Qxd8 Nxd8 8. Nd4 Bd7 9. Bc4 Bc5 10. Be3 Bxd4 11. Bxd4 Be6 12. Bb3 Nc6 13. Bc3 O-O-O 14. O-O b5 15. Bxe6 fxe6 16. b4 Nd4 17. Bxd4 Rxd4 18. c3 Rc4 19. a4 bxa4 20. Rxa4 Kb7 21. Ra3 a6 22. Rd1 g5 23. Kf1 Rf8 24. Ke2 h5 25. h3 Rc6 26. Rd4 Rf4 27. c4 Rb6 28. c5 Rb5 29. Ke3 Rf8 30. Rxe4 a5 31. Rxa5 Rxa5 32. bxa5 Kc6 33. Ra4 Kxc5 34. a6 Kb6 35. a7 Kb7 36. a8=Q Rxa8 37. Rxa8 Kxa8 38. f4 gxf4 39. Kxf4 Kb7 40. g4 hxg4 41. hxg4 Kc8 42. Ke4
For example see this game of my student IM Anwesh Upadhya in Dubai Open against GM A Fedorov.
My student played Petroff Defence as he never lost that opening against playing strong players including many GMs.
He was happy with da draw. But look how Fedorov beat him without doing anything but took 25-30 mins at move 4!!!!!
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. d4 Nxe4 4. dxe5 d5 5. Nbd2 Nc6 6. Nxe4 dxe4 7. Qxd8 Nxd8 8. Nd4 Bd7 9. Bc4 Bc5 10. Be3 Bxd4 11. Bxd4 Be6 12. Bb3 Nc6 13. Bc3 O-O-O 14. O-O b5 15. Bxe6 fxe6 16. b4 Nd4 17. Bxd4 Rxd4 18. c3 Rc4 19. a4 bxa4 20. Rxa4 Kb7 21. Ra3 a6 22. Rd1 g5 23. Kf1 Rf8 24. Ke2 h5 25. h3 Rc6 26. Rd4 Rf4 27. c4 Rb6 28. c5 Rb5 29. Ke3 Rf8 30. Rxe4 a5 31. Rxa5 Rxa5 32. bxa5 Kc6 33. Ra4 Kxc5 34. a6 Kb6 35. a7 Kb7 36. a8=Q Rxa8 37. Rxa8 Kxa8 38. f4 gxf4 39. Kxf4 Kb7 40. g4 hxg4 41. hxg4 Kc8 42. Ke4
"your student"??
In Chess and in Physics.
Ah...
Is good the boy?
Is good the boy?
You can check out the boy's games.
how im gonna check the boy's games without a link to download the games Om?
Check with the name IM Anwesh Upadhyaya
Om,be serious,how are you going to give chess clases to an IM?to do that,you must be at least a better IM or a GM
I used to teach chess when He started as a novice. Now in 5 years he is an IM. But I still work as a second for him.
well,he is a very good student and had a very good teacher
Currently his teacher is GM G Timoshenko and GM Boris Avrukh.
he must be a guy with money to be able to pay them
yes/no
>yes/no
in that case,he must has a grant,or someone pay the classes for him
GM timoshenko sponsored by father. he plays at playchess and wins hundreds of ducats. Pays 50 Ducat to Avrukh for training like free.
fathers...a blessing of God 
but if he pays 50 ducats to Avrukh,what means you assertion ''for training like free''?

but if he pays 50 ducats to Avrukh,what means you assertion ''for training like free''?
Powered by mwForum 2.27.4 © 1999-2012 Markus Wichitill