
What I also find astonishing is that whilst K4 has the help of a GM to influence its play, it is also quite remarkable that H2c also understands some of the nuances of chess, often more than K4 does. I say remarkable as I understand Mr Houdart is not a recognised chess player yet he has managed to create a chess engine that understands the 'truth' much more than any other engine I use, even more than K4.
Rating lists {or as I prefer to think of them - ranking lists} are useful if you are thinking about playing one engine against another and being able to have some idea on what the outcome might be; analysing chess can be quite different and although there is a correlation between the two, it is perhaps not what you would expect!
> Rating lists {or as I prefer to think of them - ranking lists} are useful if you are thinking about playing one engine against another and being able to have some idea on what the outcome might be; analysing chess can be quite different and although there is a correlation between the two, it is perhaps not what you would expect!
This has been my conundrum as I use engines mostly to help analyze my own games after I look at the game. I have found Houdini's "answers" to always be fairly clear and understandable. Komodo 4 also gives interesting alternatives.
And regarding the ranking lists and analysis correlation, I often find Smarthink 1.20 gives some of the best answers in thorny situations. Best answer meaning the one that might present the opponent with the most problems OTB.

So, it looks like I should take a look at this engine; I don't currently own/use it and perhaps I need too. Thanks for the advice.
Dr.D
Never heard or read such an accusation related to this chess engine....
Dr.D
> Someone else should check the stuff on this, but I seem to recall that SmarThink was found to be a clone. Anyone recall the information on this?
This is the first time I have heard of this at all.
It is a few years old as well.
> SmarThink is an extremely unique chess engine in terms of originality and playing style....
> Dr.D
I wholeheartedly agree! Smarthink is the engine look to for off the wall moves! And it is rare that any of the big boy engines refute Smarthink's choice. I think Smarthink is a great engine for ideas in OTB play.
> How old is Smarthink and is it still being developed? If it isn't, why not? You'd think such a novel engine would be developed further.
I think it is at least two years old (if not older).
I am not sure if it is still in development. There has definitely been no news about it. Lokasoft sells it and they have been very quiet on the engine front.
> Thanks! Is it a SP or MP engine? (seems quite expensive for its grade)
I believe it is SP. (i only have one core myself)
I don't know if you saw it there but Lokasoft also sells it as a UCI engine only which is a little cheaper. You don't have to buy it with ChessPartner.
Cheers,
Dr.D
On another note,I also have SmarThink 1.10 Moscow which was sent to me as a gift from the author himself after I supplied him with an opening book for a chess engines tournamnt in Moscow around three years ago...
Dr.D
P.S.SmarThink has a unique learning system,both positional and opening book related,which actually works....the more played games,the strongest the engine gets....
> I already did along time ago and it worth every penny you spend for it....
+1
> P.S.SmarThink has a unique learning system,both positional and opening book related,which actually works....the more played games,the strongest the engine gets....
This I did not know! Time to use it even more. :)
> Would you buy it? Is it original enough to warrant the cost?
I am definitely glad I bought it!
It is fun to play against and a great alternative engine for post game analysis!
Just buy the UCI version, it is cheaper. (although Chess Partner is an underrated GUI)
Eelco
> If I recall correctly, the author of Smarthink wrote to someone that he had to suspend the development of his program, because he was drafted by the army in his country. He is from Iran. It is possible that they could use his programming capabilities for more "productive" purposes than chess programming but what he was asked to do I don't know. If you would ask Lex Loep maybe he could tell you some more but I don't think the author has posted anywhere for several years now, the program participated in a CSVN tournament a few years back but that was not with a new version I think.
I thought the author of Ktulu was from Iran and that the author of Smarthink was from Russia?
Sorry! So I would suggest that you just ask Lex if he knows anything new about the author, usually Lex will respond to user e-mails within a few days and he would know if there is anything new to tell about this engine!Regards, Eelco
> Yes, you are right Tom, I also just went to check the Lokasoft site, thinking that maybe I got them mixed up, and I indeed was
Sorry! So I would suggest that you just ask Lex if he knows anything new about the author, usually Lex will respond to user e-mails within a few days and he would know if there is anything new to tell about this engine!
>
> Regards, Eelco
I thought I saw the author of Smarthink on TalkChess for a second a few months ago which got me excited but then he was gone.
I like Ktulu a lot as well.
I do regret not getting in to computer chess early enough to have been able to purchase Gandalf as it seems that was an entertaining engine as well!
Regards, Eelco
Dr.D
Any thoughts on Chess Tiger 2007?
> I remember reading something about the Smarthink engine before; perhaps from you!
>
> So, it looks like I should take a look at this engine; I don't currently own/use it and perhaps I need too. Thanks for the advice.
I got turned on to Smarthink by Frank Quisinsky. He talked about it and Ktulu and their original styles. I like Ktulu a lot as well. Good endgame engine!
Powered by mwForum 2.27.4 © 1999-2012 Markus Wichitill