My question is stemmed to anyone who has a least a quad or. Here is my question, if I use all 1 core engines in IDEA. What is the ratio that I should use to get different analysis? If I have a quad is 3-1 good enough to just 4-0? I would be curious to heard form the people that have more than a quad. Let say I have 8 cores, is 7-1 to water downed to get different analysis form 8-0? I hope what I'm saying makes sense. The first number refers to using rybka. While the 2nd number is using a different engine for a little different output. For exmaple Critter,Junior, or Hiracs etc..
imho it makes no sense in IdeA because you can“t see which tasks are analysed by a specific engine; only by running IdeA and manually IA of position you will get different results
max
max
> My question is stemmed to anyone who has a least a quad or. Here is my question, if I use all 1 core engines in IDEA. What is the ratio that I should use to get different analysis? If I have a quad is 3-1 good enough to just 4-0? I would be curious to heard form the people that have more than a quad. Let say I have 8 cores, is 7-1 to water downed to get different analysis form 8-0? I hope what I'm saying makes sense. The first number refers to using rybka. While the 2nd number is using a different engine for a little different output. For exmaple Critter,Junior, or Hiracs etc..
Agree with previous poster. You don't want to use different engines in the same tree. If you're going to use different engines to analyze the same set of positions it's best to have two different projects (and two different trees). At the moment, there's no way to assign specific IDeA engines to a specific project so writing evals from different engines in the same tree is asking for trouble.
You definetly dont want to mix several engines in the same project.
Agree with previous 3 posts. Don't mix the engines.
Ghostbusters got it right: "Don't cross the streams!!"
Powered by mwForum 2.27.4 © 1999-2012 Markus Wichitill