It would be even better with only half of the chessboard (the other half would be a reflection)
O yes... but he play Simultaneous exhibition
lol ebutaljib, How would capturing the reflected pieces work? ahah
Same as shaking hands with the "opponent"
+1
just you're right!
just you're right!
in this case a high five would work better.
lol. It's quite likely to give a try ourselves
hilarious! Thanks for posting this!
Just to not let this thread die, this is the reverse (of the medal, not of the mirror
):
):
Hi Friends,
From another interesting topic - God's Number is 20
This message is not related to chess, but it gives food for thought.
They used about 35 CPU years to find solutions to all of the positions in each of the 55,882,296 sets.
With about 35 CPU-years of idle computer time donated by Google, a team of researchers has essentially
solved every position of the Rubik's Cubeā¢, and shown that no position requires more than twenty moves
http://www.cube20.org/
I wonder when chess will be solved
S
From another interesting topic - God's Number is 20
This message is not related to chess, but it gives food for thought.
They used about 35 CPU years to find solutions to all of the positions in each of the 55,882,296 sets.
With about 35 CPU-years of idle computer time donated by Google, a team of researchers has essentially
solved every position of the Rubik's Cubeā¢, and shown that no position requires more than twenty moves
http://www.cube20.org/
I wonder when chess will be solved

S
How could Google donate 35 years of it's time when it only exists for 13 years?
35 CPU-years, meaning it would take 1 CPU in question 35 years to complete the calculations.
that's right YES
Which CPU? The one from today, 20 years ago or 20 years from now? Makes a huge difference.
1 CPU year is a very badly defined unit because it changes continuosly
1 CPU year is a very badly defined unit because it changes continuosly
Well... Google doesn't disclose the information about their systems, but 35 CPU-years estimate is based on Intel Nehalem, quad-core 2.8GHz.
Ironically, the 20 moves position is completely symmetrical (all faces are identical save for shifted colors) so I think it'd be an easy one since a careful player only needs to solve one face to solve all six
less complecate then chess.. that's true. 
Solving Rubik's cube with one hand. World Record :-)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5WdExxsZlNI

Solving Rubik's cube with one hand. World Record :-)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5WdExxsZlNI
You got it all wrong- the Spartans were all queens! (couldn't resist)
Powered by mwForum 2.27.4 © 1999-2012 Markus Wichitill