1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. 0-0 Be7 6. Bxc6 dxc6 7. Nc3 Bg4 8. h3 Bh5 9. g4 Nxg4!? 10. hxg4 Bxg4 11. Kg2 Qd6 12. Ne2 h5 13. d4 Bxf3 14. Kxf3 0-0-0 15. Rg1 h4 16. Kg2 g5 17. Qd3 exd4 18. c3 c5 19.cxd4 cxd4 20. Bd2 Qe6 21. b4 Bd6 22. Rab1 g4 23. b5 a5 24. b6 c6 25. Bg5 f6 26. Bf4 Be5 27. Rbd1 Rhf8 28. a4  Rh8 29. Kf1 h3 *

> resign.

First of all, thanks for those beautiful two games, they were both my first correspondence chess games, i will remember them for a long time and i enjoyed analyzing & playing them -and the occuring technical very difficult positions- very much! :-)
Secondly, if you allow me to say that, Mocha, there is no need to feel sorrow! Training to attend in correspondence chess tournaments in the future, i took especially these two games out of the 10 i started here very seriously and spent >90% of my thinking time with them at the time they were both decided, which is -as you know- already a few moves back. ;-)
Thirdly, if you want, we can exchange a few insights on diverse positions of the games.
Fourthly, have fun whatever yo do!

> the next time we play again, set some rules to follow.

Well, it can't be stricter time controls as you took more time than me (if you want i will carefully add them together, but pointing to your 2week-move time for Rc1 or nearly 1week per move(!) for the Shvesnikov-endgame should already give you the right direction...), it also can't be no takebakes to the one you took in the Ruy Lopez which i kindly -despite having already calculated Qb5- accepted because i'm interested in chess, what special rules do you have in mind that were not covered here by implication and human thinking/good manners?