i5-750 Win7 Pro
Deep Rybka 4 SSE42 64-bit 4CPU
Eigenmann Endgame Test @ 120 seconds per
Result: 90 out of 100 = 90.0%. Average time = 9.38s / 12.80
*whistles*
For the record, I don't think the score would drop much if the time allotted was reduced to 60 seconds. Excellent result, regardless.
Deep Rybka 4 SSE42 64-bit 4CPU
Eigenmann Endgame Test @ 120 seconds per
Result: 90 out of 100 = 90.0%. Average time = 9.38s / 12.80
*whistles*
For the record, I don't think the score would drop much if the time allotted was reduced to 60 seconds. Excellent result, regardless.
Forgot to mention:
I have partial 6-man EGTB's installed (the most popular TB's, covering about half of the 6-man endgames reached in engine v engine games according to the studies performed by Nelson et al.)
The i5-750 is gently OC'ed to 3ghz.
I have partial 6-man EGTB's installed (the most popular TB's, covering about half of the 6-man endgames reached in engine v engine games according to the studies performed by Nelson et al.)
The i5-750 is gently OC'ed to 3ghz.
Thanks for the interesting endgame test for R4. Does this mean the R4 is the strongest engine in endgames?
No Engine find this draw not even Rybka. Disgusting!!!
[Event "Blitz 1m"]
[Site "BBSR"]
[Date "2010.06.03"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Stockfish 1.7.1 JA 64bit"]
[Black "Prakash, Om"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[ECO "B81"]
[PlyCount "154"]
[TimeControl "60"]
{128MB, DON 13.ctg, Om-PC} 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 e6 {0} 3. Nc3 {B 0} d6 {8} 4. d4 {
B 0} cxd4 {8} 5. Nxd4 {B 0} Nf6 {8} 6. g4 {B 0} h6 {8} 7. h4 {B 0} Be7 {9} 8.
Qf3 {B 0} Nc6 {10} 9. Bb5 {B 0} Bd7 {9} 10. Bxc6 {B 0} bxc6 {8} 11. g5 {B 0}
hxg5 {8} 12. hxg5 {B 0} Rxh1+ {12} 13. Qxh1 {B 0} Ng4 {11} 14. Qh5 {-0.52/17 2}
Qb6 {14} 15. Qxg4 {-0.76/18 0} Qxd4 {11} 16. Qh5 {-0.56/21 0} g6 {12} 17. Qh7 {
-0.60/18 2} e5 {12} 18. Be3 {-0.60/22 0} Qb4 {13} 19. Qh8+ {-0.48/21 0} Bf8 {14
} 20. O-O-O {-0.24/21 0} Rb8 {15} 21. Kd2 {-0.28/23 0} Bg4 {14} 22. Rg1 {-0.44/
24 0} Be6 {18} 23. a3 {-0.36/24 0} Qb7 {15} 24. f4 {-0.28/24 0} exf4 {15} 25.
Bxf4 {-0.28/25 0} Kd7 {13} 26. Qd4 {-0.32/23 0} Qb6 {12} 27. Qxb6 {-0.36/19 2}
axb6 {11} 28. Rh1 {-0.36/23 0} b5 {12} 29. Rh8 {-0.32/20 2} Re8 {14} 30. Ne2 {
-0.40/19 2} Bg7 {14} 31. Rxe8 {-0.48/19 2} Kxe8 {5} 32. Bxd6 {0.60/24 0} Bxb2 {
18} 33. c3 {1.33/29 0} Kd7 {14} 34. Bb4 {1.65/29 0} Bb3 {12} 35. Nd4 {1.57/31 0
} Ba4 {15} 36. e5 {1.77/30 0} Ba1 {13} 37. e6+ {1.77/30 0} fxe6 {11} 38. Nf3 {
1.69/31 0} c5 {12} 39. Bxc5 {1.93/29 0} e5 {12} 40. Nxe5+ {1.97/20 2} Ke6 {12}
41. Nd3 {2.46/30 0} Kf5 {13} 42. Be7 {2.62/25 1} Bb3 {13} 43. Nc5 {1.09/22 1}
Ba4 {13} 44. Nxa4 {3.03/34 0} bxa4 {4} 45. Kd3 {3.07/31 0} Ke6 {24} 46. Bb4 {
3.79/36 0} Kf5 {16} 47. Kc4 {3.87/36 0} Kxg5 {14} 48. Kb5 {3.95/33 0} Kf5 {11}
49. Kxa4 {3.91/32 0} Ke6 {16} 50. Kb5 {4.52/32 0} Kd7 {13} 51. c4 {4.72/32 0}
Bd4 {13} 52. Bc5 {3.59/31 0} Be5 {12} 53. Be3 {4.68/34 0} Bd6 {15} 54. a4 {3.
31/24 2} Be7 {12} 55. Kb6 {3.43/25 1} Kc8 {12} 56. a5 {3.31/33 0} g5 {11} 57.
Kc6 {3.15/32 0} Kb8 {14} 58. Kd7 {3.47/29 1} Bb4 {13} 59. Bxg5 {3.47/37 0} Kb7
{0} 60. Bf4 {3.35/30 1} Ka6 {11} 61. Bc7 {3.35/34 1} Bc5 {14} 62. Bd6 {3.35/40
0} Ba7 {13} 63. Bb4 {3.27/35 1} Bf2 {14} 64. Ke6 {3.27/40 0} Kb7 {14} 65. Kd5 {
3.23/33 1} Ka6 {15} 66. Ke4 {3.19/33 1} Ba7 {16} 67. Be1 {3.11/41 0} Bc5 {19}
68. Bc3 {3.15/42 0} Bf8 {14} 69. Kd5 {3.15/40 0} Be7 {19} 70. Bd2 {3.15/30 1}
Bf8 {18} 71. Kc6 {3.19/32 1} Ba3 {15} 72. Bc3 {3.23/29 1} Bf8 {13} 73. Kd5 {2.
40/23 2} Be7 {23} 74. Bd2 {2.40/27 0} Bf8 {18} 75. Kc6 {2.40/28 0} Ba3 {16} 76.
Bc3 {2.40/27 1} Bf8 {22} 77. c5 {0} Bxc5 {0.00/17 0} 1/2-1/2
[Event "Blitz 1m"]
[Site "BBSR"]
[Date "2010.06.03"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Stockfish 1.7.1 JA 64bit"]
[Black "Prakash, Om"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[ECO "B81"]
[PlyCount "154"]
[TimeControl "60"]
{128MB, DON 13.ctg, Om-PC} 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 e6 {0} 3. Nc3 {B 0} d6 {8} 4. d4 {
B 0} cxd4 {8} 5. Nxd4 {B 0} Nf6 {8} 6. g4 {B 0} h6 {8} 7. h4 {B 0} Be7 {9} 8.
Qf3 {B 0} Nc6 {10} 9. Bb5 {B 0} Bd7 {9} 10. Bxc6 {B 0} bxc6 {8} 11. g5 {B 0}
hxg5 {8} 12. hxg5 {B 0} Rxh1+ {12} 13. Qxh1 {B 0} Ng4 {11} 14. Qh5 {-0.52/17 2}
Qb6 {14} 15. Qxg4 {-0.76/18 0} Qxd4 {11} 16. Qh5 {-0.56/21 0} g6 {12} 17. Qh7 {
-0.60/18 2} e5 {12} 18. Be3 {-0.60/22 0} Qb4 {13} 19. Qh8+ {-0.48/21 0} Bf8 {14
} 20. O-O-O {-0.24/21 0} Rb8 {15} 21. Kd2 {-0.28/23 0} Bg4 {14} 22. Rg1 {-0.44/
24 0} Be6 {18} 23. a3 {-0.36/24 0} Qb7 {15} 24. f4 {-0.28/24 0} exf4 {15} 25.
Bxf4 {-0.28/25 0} Kd7 {13} 26. Qd4 {-0.32/23 0} Qb6 {12} 27. Qxb6 {-0.36/19 2}
axb6 {11} 28. Rh1 {-0.36/23 0} b5 {12} 29. Rh8 {-0.32/20 2} Re8 {14} 30. Ne2 {
-0.40/19 2} Bg7 {14} 31. Rxe8 {-0.48/19 2} Kxe8 {5} 32. Bxd6 {0.60/24 0} Bxb2 {
18} 33. c3 {1.33/29 0} Kd7 {14} 34. Bb4 {1.65/29 0} Bb3 {12} 35. Nd4 {1.57/31 0
} Ba4 {15} 36. e5 {1.77/30 0} Ba1 {13} 37. e6+ {1.77/30 0} fxe6 {11} 38. Nf3 {
1.69/31 0} c5 {12} 39. Bxc5 {1.93/29 0} e5 {12} 40. Nxe5+ {1.97/20 2} Ke6 {12}
41. Nd3 {2.46/30 0} Kf5 {13} 42. Be7 {2.62/25 1} Bb3 {13} 43. Nc5 {1.09/22 1}
Ba4 {13} 44. Nxa4 {3.03/34 0} bxa4 {4} 45. Kd3 {3.07/31 0} Ke6 {24} 46. Bb4 {
3.79/36 0} Kf5 {16} 47. Kc4 {3.87/36 0} Kxg5 {14} 48. Kb5 {3.95/33 0} Kf5 {11}
49. Kxa4 {3.91/32 0} Ke6 {16} 50. Kb5 {4.52/32 0} Kd7 {13} 51. c4 {4.72/32 0}
Bd4 {13} 52. Bc5 {3.59/31 0} Be5 {12} 53. Be3 {4.68/34 0} Bd6 {15} 54. a4 {3.
31/24 2} Be7 {12} 55. Kb6 {3.43/25 1} Kc8 {12} 56. a5 {3.31/33 0} g5 {11} 57.
Kc6 {3.15/32 0} Kb8 {14} 58. Kd7 {3.47/29 1} Bb4 {13} 59. Bxg5 {3.47/37 0} Kb7
{0} 60. Bf4 {3.35/30 1} Ka6 {11} 61. Bc7 {3.35/34 1} Bc5 {14} 62. Bd6 {3.35/40
0} Ba7 {13} 63. Bb4 {3.27/35 1} Bf2 {14} 64. Ke6 {3.27/40 0} Kb7 {14} 65. Kd5 {
3.23/33 1} Ka6 {15} 66. Ke4 {3.19/33 1} Ba7 {16} 67. Be1 {3.11/41 0} Bc5 {19}
68. Bc3 {3.15/42 0} Bf8 {14} 69. Kd5 {3.15/40 0} Be7 {19} 70. Bd2 {3.15/30 1}
Bf8 {18} 71. Kc6 {3.19/32 1} Ba3 {15} 72. Bc3 {3.23/29 1} Bf8 {13} 73. Kd5 {2.
40/23 2} Be7 {23} 74. Bd2 {2.40/27 0} Bf8 {18} 75. Kc6 {2.40/28 0} Ba3 {16} 76.
Bc3 {2.40/27 1} Bf8 {22} 77. c5 {0} Bxc5 {0.00/17 0} 1/2-1/2
> Thanks for the interesting endgame test for R4. Does this mean the R4 is the strongest engine in endgames?
I haven't tested a wide variety of engines so I can't be sure but this is the highest score on the EET that I've seen yet and I've tested many of the engines considered decent in the endgame. One caveat: I haven't tested Stockfish 1.7x yet but I expect it to score really well based on it's reputation as a good endgame performer.
Is there a similar test suite for middle game positions?
> Is there a similar test suite for middle game positions?
http://sites.google.com/site/strategictestsuite/
Thanks, Moz!
Powered by mwForum 2.27.4 © 1999-2012 Markus Wichitill