Topic The Rybka Lounge / Correspondence Chess / Bobby C Vs. Harvey Williamson (Rybka Forum v FICGS) 1/2-1/2
This is board 1 of the match. Bobby C is white, Harvey Williamson is black.
Average from 24 to 48 hours per move. No time forfeit. No help from other person allowed.
Good luck!
Average from 24 to 48 hours per move. No time forfeit. No help from other person allowed.
rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1
Good luck!
I could have played my game at FICGS but here is fine too.
1.e4
BTW: I will post a board and moves list every so often. I don't think there is a need to post a new FEN with moves list every time we move. Harvey and I are both used to playing games on forums so I am sure it will work out fine.
1.e4
BTW: I will post a board and moves list every so often. I don't think there is a need to post a new FEN with moves list every time we move. Harvey and I are both used to playing games on forums so I am sure it will work out fine.
1...e5
[Event "Rybka Forum vs FICGS"]
[Site "Rybka Forum"]
[Date "2010.04.21"]
[White "Casey, Bobby"]
[Black "Williamson, Harvey"]
[Result "*"]
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 *
[Site "Rybka Forum"]
[Date "2010.04.21"]
[White "Casey, Bobby"]
[Black "Williamson, Harvey"]
[Result "*"]
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 *
rnbqkbnr/pppp1ppp/8/4p3/4P3/5N2/PPPP1PPP/RNBQKB1R b KQkq - 0 2
I would have nervously played the 2.c3 Sicilian had you went that way. I didn't suspect you would want to play something as popular as the Sicilian though so I felt fine playing 1.e4. Knowing what your capable of makes me wonder how soon I will get a novelty/unusual line popped on me....
2...Nc6 Me a novelty? Never :)
3.Bb5
I'll re-post the moves and board in a reply to the original post after a few more moves. That way everything doesn't keep getting pushed to the right.
I'll re-post the moves and board in a reply to the original post after a few more moves. That way everything doesn't keep getting pushed to the right.
ok here we go
3...f5
3...f5
Sweet, this will be a good fun game to play. I'm going to look at houses right now but I will move later this afternoon when I get back.
OK, I just got done watching the scene in the park from "Searching for Bobby Fischer" where young Josh plays this line against Vinnie(Laurence Fishburne) and I think I know where Vinnie screwed up. Let's see if I can do better then Vinnie this time. I made a new post as well with moves and FEN at the bottom. We can reply to that for the next few moves.....
And some of my favorite Vinnie quotes...
#1
Vinnie: What's that?
Josh Waitzkin: Schliemann attack.
Vinnie: Schliemann attack? Where'd you learn that from, a book?
Josh Waitzkin: No, my teacher taught me.
Vinnie: Oh, your teacher. Well, forget it. Play like you used to, from the gut. Get your pawns rolling on the queen's side. Come and get me.
#2
Vinnie: He didn't teach you how to win, he taught you how not to lose. That's nothing to be proud of. You're playing not to lose, Josh. You've got to risk losing. You've got to risk everything. You've got to go to the edge of defeat. That's where you want to be, boy - on the edge of defeat.
Josh Waitzkin: But...
Vinnie: But what? Play. Never play the board, always the man. You've gotta play the man *playing* the board. Play *me*. I'm your opponent, you have to beat *me*. Not the board, beat *me*.
#3
Vinnie: There it is!
And some of my favorite Vinnie quotes...
#1
Vinnie: What's that?
Josh Waitzkin: Schliemann attack.
Vinnie: Schliemann attack? Where'd you learn that from, a book?
Josh Waitzkin: No, my teacher taught me.
Vinnie: Oh, your teacher. Well, forget it. Play like you used to, from the gut. Get your pawns rolling on the queen's side. Come and get me.
#2
Vinnie: He didn't teach you how to win, he taught you how not to lose. That's nothing to be proud of. You're playing not to lose, Josh. You've got to risk losing. You've got to risk everything. You've got to go to the edge of defeat. That's where you want to be, boy - on the edge of defeat.
Josh Waitzkin: But...
Vinnie: But what? Play. Never play the board, always the man. You've gotta play the man *playing* the board. Play *me*. I'm your opponent, you have to beat *me*. Not the board, beat *me*.
#3
Vinnie: There it is!
Well, Josh nowadays has become world champion in some obscure martial art discipline.
>ok here we go
>3...f5
Fortune favours the brave :)
Regards
Tony
I'm rooting for Harvey on this one. No offence Booby C ;)
And I'm rooting for Bobby on this one. No offense Harvey :) :)
and i am rooting for Bobby C. our top player on Rybka A team.
[Event "Rybka Forum vs FICGS"]
[Site "Rybka Forum"]
[Date "2010.04.21"]
[White "Casey, Bobby"]
[Black "Williamson, Harvey"]
[ECO "C63"] - The Schliemann Defense(Jaenisch Gambit) - Berger Variation
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 f5 4. Nc3 *
[Site "Rybka Forum"]
[Date "2010.04.21"]
[White "Casey, Bobby"]
[Black "Williamson, Harvey"]
[ECO "C63"] - The Schliemann Defense(Jaenisch Gambit) - Berger Variation
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 f5 4. Nc3 *
r1bqkbnr/pppp2pp/2n5/1B2pp2/4P3/2N2N2/PPPP1PPP/R1BQK2R b KQkq - 0 4
4...fxe4
This is going to be fun. I am glad you played Nc3 and not d3.
This is going to be fun. I am glad you played Nc3 and not d3.
5.Nxe4
I looked at them both and d3 was more drawish. I want to win but if not I want to see something crazy and with d3 it looked really boring.
>I am glad you played Nc3 and not d3.
I looked at them both and d3 was more drawish. I want to win but if not I want to see something crazy and with d3 it looked really boring.
5...Nf6 5...d5 is interesting but I don't have time to work out all the complications.
6.Nxf6+
If I would have played 6.Qe2 you could have brought out 6...d5, something I did not want.
>5...d5 is interesting
If I would have played 6.Qe2 you could have brought out 6...d5, something I did not want.
6...Qxf6
7.Qe2
I'll move post another moves list with FEN after the next move.
I'll move post another moves list with FEN after the next move.
...Be7
Moved below 8.Bxc6
bobby 4.d3 would have been better as per analysis by Teimour Radjabov
> Teimour Radjabov
Who? This guys play correspondence chess or is he just giving his human opinion? With 4.d3 I saw a position that Harvey would easily be able to draw probably much like what we are about to be in anyways but at least the engines give me a nice eval here. This game is in progress but I would love to talk about the differences between 4.d3, 4.Nc3 or even old school 4.d4 after the game is over.
[Event "Rybka Forum vs FICGS"]
[Site "Rybka Forum"]
[Date "2010.04.21"]
[White "Casey, Bobby"]
[Black "Williamson, Harvey"]
[Result "*"]
[ECO "C63"]
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 f5 4. Nc3 fxe4 5. Nxe4 Nf6 6. Nxf6+ Qxf6 7. Qe2 Be7
8. Bxc6 *
[Site "Rybka Forum"]
[Date "2010.04.21"]
[White "Casey, Bobby"]
[Black "Williamson, Harvey"]
[Result "*"]
[ECO "C63"]
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 f5 4. Nc3 fxe4 5. Nxe4 Nf6 6. Nxf6+ Qxf6 7. Qe2 Be7
8. Bxc6 *
r1b1k2r/ppppb1pp/2B2q2/4p3/8/5N2/PPPPQPPP/R1B1K2R b KQkq - 0 8
...bxc6
9.d4
So far everything looks like this opening is a decent way for black to draw... I guess we will see how it plays out.. :)
So far everything looks like this opening is a decent way for black to draw... I guess we will see how it plays out.. :)
...Qg6
10.0-0
10...d6
you 2 are bone idle,put the board up for the kibitzers.
"bone idle" - Had to look that one up but it means "lazy" lol. Nat12, I'm not going to post a new board every move cuz it takes up too much space. Every four or five moves is ok, if you can't visualize that many moves ahead you'll have to lay off the Cuban cigars per doctors orders.
If Paul wasn't such a slacker he would keep his own board up to date.
the reason i mention it is that i am 2 pawns down against Sekos and to a casual observer it may appear i am losing but this is not the case.
Moved below - 11.Qc4
It can be confirmed by multiple sources that I predicted that Harvey would play 3...f5. :-)
not a difficult prediction to make... :)
You can only predict one thing when playing Harvey. You know that he will not play a B90 or something analyzed to death on playchess. He likes to play something unique and interesting so 3...f5 would not have been hard to pick. Until I started playing the 2.c3 Sicilian I would have normally played 1.d4 to avoid a very simple draw for black but against Harvey I doubted 1.e4 c5 would even happen so I got to play 1.e4 :) I know a lot of people still like to play at the Sicilian with white but I am sure that on close to equal hardware/engines the Sicilian is easy to draw for black if black intends to play for only a draw.
Yes, it has to be shown yet that there is a forced win for white in the Sicilian... such a conclusion would ruin the chess-game altogether, so hopefully we can enjoy the attraction of the Sicilian (especially in non-computer play) for many years to come...
Hi,
I am interested in whites 11th move :)
Regards
I am interested in whites 11th move :)
Regards
I wondered if White would have gone for 7.0-0 but instead Qe2 was played and yes, White's 11th move would be very interesting...
[Event "Rybka Forum vs FICGS"]
[Site "Rybka Forum"]
[Date "2010.04.21"]
[White "Casey, Bobby"]
[Black "Williamson, Harvey"]
[ECO "C63"]
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 f5 4. Nc3 fxe4 5. Nxe4 Nf6 6. Nxf6+ Qxf6 7. Qe2 Be7
8. Bxc6 bxc6 9. d4 Qg6 10. O-O d6 11. Qc4 *
[Site "Rybka Forum"]
[Date "2010.04.21"]
[White "Casey, Bobby"]
[Black "Williamson, Harvey"]
[ECO "C63"]
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 f5 4. Nc3 fxe4 5. Nxe4 Nf6 6. Nxf6+ Qxf6 7. Qe2 Be7
8. Bxc6 bxc6 9. d4 Qg6 10. O-O d6 11. Qc4 *
r1b1k2r/p1p1b1pp/2pp2q1/4p3/2QP4/5N2/PPP2PPP/R1B2RK1 b kq - 0 11
11. Qc4 yep thats the kiddie :)
Its only a personal view but white will always have the edge now, but still drawable with the 2 bishops
Regards
Its only a personal view but white will always have the edge now, but still drawable with the 2 bishops
Regards
dunno about that, perhaps computer evals might crash shortly :)
>dunno about that, perhaps computer evals might crash shortly
Hi,
It is not computer evaluatons as they were not used, it is the basic structure of the position
Regards
would love to discuss more, but perhaps after they cross moves 15-16 ?
11...d5
12.Qc3
Topic The Rybka Lounge / Correspondence Chess / Bobby C Vs. Harvey Williamson (Rybka Forum v FICGS) 1/2-1/2
Powered by mwForum 2.27.4 © 1999-2012 Markus Wichitill
